We will profile those that are a major threat to us such as those Arabs. We can interview them in a camp facility for 1 days and then let them visit us. They must meet our immigration criteria. I am not being racist but only profiling like GWB said.
GOD BLESS AMERICA
2006-07-08 02:38:43 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
Need To Quit Allowing So Many Anybodies In Period,I Don't Need Their Stinkin Tourist Dollar
2006-07-08 02:43:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
I'm not an arab, and yet I was offended by such post. Countries should be open to trade and flow of people, instead of claiming all arabs are a threat to the US. The way I see it, the US has caused more harm in Arab countries then the other way round.
This post and the racist answers to it simply diminish my trust in mankind.
2006-07-08 02:46:40 · answer #2 · answered by Ukifune 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is not just screening but the numbers of them getting education and benefits we subsidize for poor people. That is why we have limits on poor immigrants to begin with.
How we screen isn't important. We can do it while they are still home, as we do now. Our legal immigrants have a lower incidence of crime, etc. than our general population, probably because of this screening, already. It is the ones who come illegally who are a problem this way.
In order to enforce any sort of screening, we need to control our borders and be able to track our visas for overstays. That is what we don't have yet and need before we can figure out how much additional immigration we need and let in a suitable quota. However, whatever that quota turns out to be needs to INCLUDE any family, they mustn't be able to come in above that amount. Those are the ones who get the heavy amount of services, and we need to limit how many can come.
In fact, a true guest worker seasonal program, for example, which did not let in family, would not have this problem. Democrats don't want anyone here unless they have a chance to be citizens, which is where the problem comes in. I think the Democrats are crazy on this point since it limits who can come and still protect our services. There are many in Mexico, for example, and possibly in other countries as well, who would be very happy to come here for 6 month seasonal work, go back to thier families, and live on the higher standard of living the money would buy them in Mexico.
If we let them come with family, we have to strictly limit the numbers.
The Senate Bill is essentially unlimited, screened immigration, and needs to burned with ceremony as an example to other bad Bills.
2006-07-08 02:54:11 · answer #3 · answered by DAR 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
hi. i'm for a smaller set variety of legal immigrants to enter into the rustic. i'd cut lower back the inflow we've been coping with for a lengthy time period way down... possibly more beneficial than 50%... and perchance extra for particular international places. the first actual requirement is they ought to have a sparkling record (i.e. no criminal heritage), honestly ought to communicate english conversationally, and they ought to haven't any communicable illnesses by any ability. i imagine when you may fit into this team should be allowed in interior of a set project of time. frequently those who do come into this u . s . a . get no taxation for multiple years and get welfare for a set time also. i'd replace the taxation at modern-day, and in the journey that they prefer to be the following they ought to pay taxes like all different American. i'd provide them welfare for no more beneficial than 2-2 a million/2 years and which could be it... reckoning on what number dependents. So i'd be a lot extra restrictive and restricting had I the means. it really is my difficulty-free concept.
2016-11-01 10:46:21 · answer #4 · answered by pachter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That might work if they have somekind of Military Personel with them for 24 Hours. I really have my doubts about this, I mean, what about people to the south of the border? They'll definetly be pissed off about letting a Arabian man be on U.S. soil other than themselves. Nope, too much of a risk, not worth it.
2006-07-08 02:43:33 · answer #5 · answered by andy14darock 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your republican immigration criteria already sucks. What else you have to offer except flight lessons for the dudes that can purchase the flight school along with the planes they love to fly?
2006-07-08 09:30:34 · answer #6 · answered by Stomp 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think that's such a bad idea as long as your not putting them under a magnifying glass
2006-07-08 03:22:10 · answer #7 · answered by gidget lil bit 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What is your problem with all Arabs?
2006-07-08 07:30:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋