2006-07-07 23:46:44 · 15 answers · asked by Z, unnecessary letter 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Etiquette
I only find it insulting is when a guy things a girl is uncapable of doing something. So he insists on doing it in stead. Cuz some guys thing that they will always be the stronger ones. and girls will always be emotional. And it never can be switched around like the guys be emotional and the girls be stronger in some cases. Another thing that bugs me about both genders is. It bugs me when i hear comments made by either a guy or a girl about how the other gender is not as important. But hello step back no matter what both genders need eachother no matter what. i personally don't think either gender could live with out the other one. Well there are some exceptions though. but thats just overall.
2006-07-08 05:01:55 · answer #1 · answered by I Luv Joel Madden!! 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I think of the fairer sex as being seen as more gentle. I think as a girl that is a good thing.
2006-07-08 02:56:16 · answer #2 · answered by leahcutie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i will likely get thumbs down for this or maybe possibly deserve em yet i imagine the stud/slut double customary is extra enforced by employing women/nature and the relative cost positioned on sex. a twin of a number of different male in nature we adult men are meant to earn sex and affections from women. If sex got here as freely as many of the added liberated talkin women say they prefer to grant it society and its children ought to struggle through from moral decay. no longer keeping women want to be puritanical or virgins yet they shouldn't attempt to be studs or throw away the inherent cost of being pursued both. and a lot less face it maximum women fairly do not favor that anymore then they prefer the right to bypass topless in public that some feministicals protest for. authentic Brit and Sox lined grimy previous guy/ cougar actual thoroughly. Rodney ain't were given no company tryin to characteristic something to that.
2016-11-06 01:18:52 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as woman continue to seek men who are taller, stronger physically they will always be called the "weaker" sex. Even the so called "feminist" girls do not realize that woman will never be able to equals to men since they themselves wish to be with a man who is taller than them making them feel secure and protected. The day it becomes acceptable for a woman to be seen with short men, there will be true equality. The excuse that tall men are more attractive is non-sense.
2006-07-07 23:56:00 · answer #4 · answered by Help Me 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
As a male, I think "fairer" means more gentle, as in less aggressive than males in general.
2006-07-08 00:01:11 · answer #5 · answered by stitch_groover 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. I think most people--both men and women--would agree that females are the more aesthetically pleasing of the two genders.
If anyone called me the "weaker" sex, on the other hand, I'd deck him.
2006-07-08 01:16:19 · answer #6 · answered by Maggie P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The word "fairer" is not a derogatory term.
2006-07-10 01:41:03 · answer #7 · answered by Ouros 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. I'm fed up with people who get offended over the silliest of things. Political correctness has gone too far.
2006-07-08 00:29:28 · answer #8 · answered by Rachel 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No and the gentler sex is another option. Also we are the neighboring sex, not the opposite, we are much more alike than not.
2006-07-08 00:53:34 · answer #9 · answered by -Tequila17 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no not at all. I know I am fairer than all you guys. sleeks comment is stupid
2006-07-07 23:49:59 · answer #10 · answered by nastaany1 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋