English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-07 21:43:59 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

20 answers

No if it's for the cause. Yes if the war is intentional.

2006-07-07 21:47:18 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

NO, what is it with people trying to label him as the devil. There are more evil people out there than George Bush. But those who hate the US will do anything to focus their hate on the president.

By buying to this Bush Murderer thing, you are helping the terrorists.

So go throw so more gas on the fire, Instead of looking for the real murderers.

2006-07-07 21:49:57 · answer #2 · answered by Jon H 5 · 0 0

Seeing as how it was a Clinton policy to remove Saddam, I'd go with no. You can't just start a process like a change in government and then run out on it when it becomes inconvenient. I mean look what happened in Vietnam or with Afghanistan after the Soviets pulled out. It's all a process, and it must be completed.

2006-07-07 22:57:23 · answer #3 · answered by joshanderson76 2 · 0 0

He leads the team of murderers and have given them the assignment/mandate to undertake historical brutalities in occupied territory.
Recall the happenings in Abu Ghuraib jail and Guantanamo Bay.
Human history of brutalities by Roman Empires and pre-historic stone-age events is being re-written in Iraq and Afghanistan.

2006-07-07 22:55:35 · answer #4 · answered by Saadi 5 · 0 0

No but John Kerry and President Clinton and a majority of the Demokrats and Liberals on Capitol Hill are. I think you are a moron as well. I agree with the person above and silverwolf has no clue what they are talking about.

2006-07-07 21:47:56 · answer #5 · answered by amulek1978 3 · 0 0

Absolutely As Governor of Texas he signed 156 death warrants. Many were cleared of their crimes by DNA evidence after the executions. Some had An IQ of 70 or lower (mentally retarded).
Don't get me started on Iraq. When we drop bombs on civilians, we are the terrorists.

2006-07-07 22:06:32 · answer #6 · answered by ceppie42 2 · 0 0

paul f paul f paul f what are we to do with you your sedition is going to get you into a lot of trouble they are watching you they are always watching you...whooooooooo,of course bush is im not a yank down with bush free sadam.im kidding kidding take it easy or am i? serious we only see and hear what the media tells us and thats somthing we should not rely on scandal sells .to answer your question who knows man maybe he is maybe he isnt but hes still a meat

2006-07-07 22:09:03 · answer #7 · answered by arghhh 2 · 0 0

Yes sending troops into iraq is illegal bush admitted that a few weeks ago and he is the american version of winston churchill

2006-07-08 08:32:49 · answer #8 · answered by HHH 6 · 0 0

Bush is an idiot. This war is a vendetta war. He sent our kids to die for revenge. Sadam tried to kill his father so this is his retaliation. Check it out.. the facts are there.

2006-07-07 21:48:09 · answer #9 · answered by SilverWolf 2 · 0 0

No, insurgents murder of their own people as well as our soldiers.

Hitler and Sadam were murderers and they both used gas to kill people and used mass graves.

2006-07-07 22:24:39 · answer #10 · answered by Elizabeth l 2 · 0 0

yes without a doubt though he doesnt used hes own hands to murder those people

2006-07-07 23:41:54 · answer #11 · answered by jhey 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers