Is this the evidence for evolution?
Piltdown Man - A deliberate hoax. Ended up being a ape jaw attached to a human skull that was stained to look old.
Java Man - The discover later rejected it stating that a human & ape were just found in proximity.
Peking Man - Tools & human bones were found near the apes whose brains they were eating (monkey brains are still eaten in China).
Nebraska Man - An entire person (and family) was envisioned from a single tooth... a tooth that later proved to have come from a pig.
Lucy - Reclassified as an extinct ape.
Ramapithecus - A jaw & teeth were eventually dismissed as early human in origin (an Orangutan).
Neanderthal.... a man?
It was once thought that the Neanderthal was a man. But, thanks to advancement in science, genetic DNA research indicates that the chromosomes do not match those of humans. They do match those of bi-pedal primates (apes) though.
Tools? The use of crude tools by Neanderthal does not mean they were human. Many animals including birds, fish, and mammals use "tools".
Shelter? If Neanderthal created shelters, it does not imply they were human. Many animals (beavers, birds, bees) also construct shelters.
Religion? There is no evidence that Neanderthal practiced any form of worship or religion. Interestingly, that is the primary way the bible separates Man from animals.
Why then do some people still insist Neanderthal was man?
Evolution is defied by agnostic people like Michael Behe... a microbiologist. He wrote the book "Darwin's Black Box" I suggest everyone read it and learn.
2006-07-07 20:28:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by ddead_alive 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not exactly sure that would work unless early human had some odd genitalia.
Anyway It is more or less physically impossible to impregnate a female human by simply bumping into her, no matter how amorously, and, assuming we believe in evolution of course, it is also not possible for our ancestors, dating back to when the first slimy bastard crawled out of the ocean, to have reproduced simply by bumping into eachother.
And if you believe evolution not everything is possible. Fine it's possible but humans having some recent ancestor that bumped into each other then went back to vanilla ******* is about as likely as the atoms in your *** lining up with the atoms in your chair and you falling through it.
All we know so far about human evolution is that we evolved from primates and eventually learned to walk on our hind legs and use our oversized brains to blow eachother up in new and interesting ways, the entire time using the good ol' penis and vagina technique of making babies.
If you really want to argue semantics though, the first true "humans" were the same as you and me, just shorter and leaner because of their diet/habitat. And I don't know about you but I don't bump into women and get, shall we say, sprung.
Unless of course this was all a euphamism for humping then don't I look stupid(er).
2006-07-08 03:33:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by Lucifer 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nope, they where watching the naked Chanel they TiVo'ed and they thought it'd be nice to try something new!
Why do ppl think this is a serious question?
PPl are dissin' both creationism and science.
I believe in God and I know because I have faith in things unseen.
Science also has faith in things unseen, like the big bang for which there is absolutely nothing more than speculations, some old bones already proven false, planted or mistaken and a whole bunch of theories, If science really had a solid answer they would've already shut ppl like me up years ago, but they don't, and Creationism believers don't have concise proof of what they believe either, otherwise, we would shut scientists up years ago.
Merry Christmas, everyone!
2006-07-08 03:45:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by Radwan G 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
The first "proto human" reproduced by giving in to biologic urgings. All animal life on this planet has the urge to mate and reproduce. That urge is still alive and strong today. It's religion that puts restrictions and guilt on it.
2006-07-08 03:35:01
·
answer #4
·
answered by Norman Conquest 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
God is the creator, where is your proof of evolution? And don't turn this around and say give me proof of God's exsistence, because you need faith to believe in God. But how are people supposed to believe in evolution? There is no creator. How did it all start? I believe in God, and that is why anything is possible!
2006-07-08 03:35:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
But how did those first humans come into existance?This whole universe reproduces. Reproduction is the vehicle of life it is no accident.
2006-07-08 03:36:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nuray 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If creation were true did Eve come out of Adam's rib and did Abel and Cain marry their sisters? If you believe creation anything is possible too. All you have to say is God did it.
2006-07-08 03:30:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by worldisstillthesame 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yay... ddead_alive has copy pasted the same rubbish he/she posts for every evolution question.
How about actually trying to answer a question sometime ?
2006-07-08 03:33:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Cindy 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe PLEASURE was the objective, not REPRODUCTION.
Maybe, during their short lifespan, she was always pregnant, pushing out little people, and caring for a brood of youngins.
Maybe it was much much later that they figured out what was causing that. For a very long time, it was thought that he was planting a "seed" inside of her. It wasn't until much later that it was learned that she contributed as much to reproduction as he did.
2006-07-08 03:46:30
·
answer #9
·
answered by My Big Bear Ron 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
By the stupidity of that question, only you, who hasn't evolved, was created from a bump on a monkey's @ss.
2006-07-08 03:32:20
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋