English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Could the third antichrist be a place rather than a person? Theologians state there's only 3 possible Antichrists. Two are dead. If the 3rd one is a place, which place could it be?
North Korea, possibly, with all that been happening lately? What's your opinion?

2006-07-07 15:30:55 · 17 answers · asked by ZORRO 3 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Keep in mind that religious history (or theologians) have said Hitler & Napoleon were the two military dictators who were considered to be the closest persons to be labeled the Antichrist.

2006-07-07 15:50:33 · update #1

17 answers

We dont know. Only GOD himself and the Antichrist of course know. Even people around the Anti Christ dont know until it is time. We will all know once there is peace globally. He who iniciates this peace is the antichrist. Upon peace the Antichrist will promote 7 years of peace. In the middle of the 4th year aprox. 3 1/2 years he will break his convenant and declare himself GOD. We are close as the bible states that we are in the end of times.

2006-07-07 15:34:56 · answer #1 · answered by sosevere 2 · 1 0

Yes, I've heard this. I think Nostradamus also for-seen this, supposedly, and historians agree.

I think Hitler may have been an Antichrist but Napoleon I'm not so sure about. Hitler was committing Genocide an Ethnic cleansing. Napoleon was doing it for himself and seemed like he wanted to be seen as Great, I don't know much about Napoleon except from what I've seen in documentaries.

I feel the real Antichrist will be Christians or Catholics Conservatives and be widely excepted. I also feel that the Antichrist will be very prejudice in some way shape or form, and wage war with his fellow man for their beliefs. The Antichrist Willl be greatly excepted by the majority. A lot of bad things wil take place before everyone realizes it, but this is just my interpretation and opinion.

2006-07-08 01:52:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Hitler and Napoleon were not Antichrists. The Antichrist mentioned in the Bible will probably come from the Middle East.

2006-07-07 22:35:25 · answer #3 · answered by FL Girl 6 · 0 0

You know your question and it's interpretation quite interesting on how history identifies the anti-Christ if you ask a German who lived in the time of Hitler who loved him more then God himself and this love was not forced upon them as it was the rest of the world they would call Churchill the anti-Christ , so Hitler lost Hitler becomes the anti Christ of the modern times are you really sure that two of the anti-Christ have all ready came, let ask the French about the emperor Napoleon in his world the French people loved him the English called him the devil on earth you see I question your interpretation could be miss guided it counts on who writes the history of whom one calls the anti-Christ to the Muslims President Bush is the anti Christ and to the christian world Osama Ben Lauden is an anti-Christ Wash your hands and look for the truth between the lines.

2006-07-07 22:51:08 · answer #4 · answered by lonelytommy 1 · 0 0

There have been many many Antichrists. Anyone who claims the authority of God is an Antichrist. What man claims to have the power and authority of God Almighty?

2006-07-07 22:46:59 · answer #5 · answered by SEOplanNOW.com 7 · 0 0

I believe the antIchrist will come out of the U.S.
Maybe the next President?

2006-07-07 22:33:17 · answer #6 · answered by Bad Boy 2 · 0 0

I don't know where you are getting your history but there is only one Antichrist and he hasn't come yet. He will be Jewish though because the Jews will think he is the true Messiah.

2006-07-07 22:33:18 · answer #7 · answered by on my way 4 · 0 0

Where are you studying religious history. Hitler, Napoleon, Machiavelli, Stalin, Mussolini, Sadium Hussein, Torquemada, Cortez, are just a few of the truly evil persons that have been paraded across our history.

During the Medieval times much desecration of religious teachings were destroyed.

It is impossible, in my opinion, to predict anything because we do not know the truth about religious doctrine for sure including an Antichrist.

I have attached two quotes the first on the name of the Antichrist and the second from one of my favorite religious writers on knowledge.

"The name of Antichrist:
Inasmuch, then, as this name "Titan" has so much to recommend it, there is a strong degree of probability, that from among the many names suggested, we infer, that perchance he who is to come shall be called "Titan". WE WILL NOT, HOWEVER, INCUR THE RISK OF PRONOUNCING POSITIVELY AS TO THE NAME OF ANTICHRIST; FOR IF IT WERE NECESSARY THAT HIS NAME SHOULD BE DISTINCTLY REVEALED IN THIS PRESENT TIME, IT WOULD HAVE BEEN ANNOUNCED BY HIM WHO BEHELD THE APOCALYPTIC VISION.

"But as for those who, for the sake of vainglory, allay it down for certain that names containing the spurious number are to be accepted, and affirm that this name, is that of him who is to come; such persons shall not come forth without loss, Because they have led into error both themselves and others. Now, in the first place, it is loss to wander from the truth, and to imagine that as being the case which is not. Moreover, another danger, by no means trifling, shall overtake those who falsely presume that they know the name of Antichrist. For if these men assume one name, when he shall come having another name, they will be Easily led away by him, as supposing him not to be the expected one, who must be guarded against.

"Let them await in the first place, the division of the kingdom into ten; then, in the next place, when these kings are reigning, and beginning to set their affairs in order, and advance their kingdom. Let them learn to acknowledge that he who shall come claiming the kingdom for himself, and shall terrify those men of whom we have been speaking, having a name containing the aforesaid number, is truly the abomination of desolation. this too, the apostle affirms: 'When they shall say, peace and safety, then sudden destruction shall come upon them.' 1 Thess.v:3" Saint Irenaeus.

AND FROM SAINT THOMAS AQUINAS

"… it should be noted that different ways of knowing (ratio cognoscibilis) give us different sciences. The astronomer and the natural philosopher both conclude that the earth is round, but the astronomer does this through a mathematical middle that is abstracted from matter, whereas the natural philosopher considers a middle lodged in matter. Thus there is nothing to prevent another science from treating in the light of divine revelation what the philosophical disciplines treat as knowable in the light of human reason. (Summa theologiae, Ia, q. 1, a., ad 2)
Thomas Aquinas (1225-1274)



Good luck in your search. :o)

2006-07-07 22:57:55 · answer #8 · answered by LUCIBEE 2 · 0 0

2 Thes 2
1 John 2
Matthew 24
daniel 11-12
Mark 13
Luke 21
2 John
rev 19 & 20
a person

2006-07-07 23:03:31 · answer #9 · answered by robert p 7 · 0 0

Doesn't the bible say that the antichrist will unite all people/religions. It could be a place. Who knows, I know i won't be around for that though.
http://thekingsrings.com/romans_road/contact.html

2006-07-07 22:33:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers