How can one change the U.S. political system so it is truly democratic, and not controlled by the few?

Question

Although the U.S. calls itself a democracy, it is, in reality controlled by two political parties that are sustained by massive support from large corporations and wealthy individuals. Why is nothing being done to level the playing field for new, underfunded parties? Why are politicians allowed to conduct their activities out of the public eye? Why is the electoral system allowed to remain in spite of its irrelevance in the 21st century? Why aren't politicians trying to strengthen democracy by encouraging progress towards direct democratic principals? How can the average citizen whose time is taken up with making a living hope to have an impact on efforts to take the country back from short-sighted, greedy and selfish individuals? Being provided the opportunity time and time again to vote for the the lesser of two evils (candidates) is not going to make much differfence over the long term.

Answer 1

Well, you have to call for a new constitutional convention. Now that will be hard because a lot of people in this country thinks the state came from god, or think the constitution is some sacred document made by infallible men.

Anyway, I don't believe in direct democracy, it is dangerous giving the power to the mob (American Gladiators #1, anyone?). In theory the cream rises to the top and those representing the general public will be more temperate and rational. Well, we have way too many wackos in Congress and state legislatures but at least we can hold those wackos accountable. With a direct democracy everybody can vote with their feet and no one will be held accountable.

Answer 2

First, there is not any medical evidence that MGW is a disaster. There are in straightforward words 20-atypical IPCC computer fashions that do not agree interior a ingredient of 10, and a range of of puzzled correlations... In any experience, correlations are literally not evidence... there is progressively extra peer reviewed revealed medical papers that aspect out the sensitivity of the IPCC fashions is too intense, and that the actual MGW result's interior widespread version. That suggested, please tell the searching ahead to throng which global political equipment has worked effectively to do some thing?! The UN? The Oil for nutrition ripoff? Any sentence that incorporates "international's political equipment" and "accomplishment" is an computerized non starter. The "international" more desirable the Kyoto protocol that the US Senate wisely voted 95-0 (it really is 95 to 0) to not ratify because it would wreck the US economic equipment. Seeing what has got here about to the international locations which have taken on Kyoto, they were precise.

Answer 3

It's a truism that the People always get the government they deserve. The U.S. is democratic, you don't have to vote for either party. But since the people are too lazy to develop, promote, and actually VOTE for anyone else, you get what you get.

Democratic governments are true reflections of society. Government is big, bloated, lazy, and selfish because society is. The reason we can't have a candidate who is a real leader, who tells the truth, and faces the tough problems is because the people will not accept that and do not want that. It's easier just to go along.

Don't blame our system of government, or even the government itself. The blame should be placed right at the feet of the American people, who do indeed determine who runs this country.

Answer 4

Remember studying ancient Rome? They called it an oligarchy masquerading as a Republic. I believe that the hallmark event for this takeover was the assassination of JFK. there are plenty of theories about that and one of them involves the CIA. Wasn't papa Bush a major player in the CIA back then? Isn't it possible that what has happened to our government and to our freedoms is the result of long-range planning by some very bright people? (Papa Bush, Not Baby Bush) Bush and Cheney and Rumsfeld and Rice have Bush's Idiot son as a figurehead and a puppet as they continue to advance their agenda. By the way,what ever happened to Colin Powell? He must have found some vestigial integrity, so they had to drop him out of the inner circle.

Answer 5

We would want to change it to a parliamentarian form of proportional representation, where all viewpoints have consideration in the political arena. Have you ever wondered why ALL modern democracies enacted a parliamentarian form of government and not the American 2-party form? I agree with those who parrot, "America is not a democracy". It isn't. It is a "revolving monarchy".

Answer 6

Socrates lived in a purely democratic society and look what happen to him....we'd only have the tyranny of the majority to fear so what difference does it really make? Either way we'd have to fight against injustice.

Answer 7

truly brilliant question.
"revolution" is the only answer that jumps to my mind, but...
it's just my best guess, i wish i knew the truth.

and since i noticed that this is your first day on yahoo answers and this is your first question.... let me just warn you, most Yahoo Answers users are complete morons. Yahoo Answers definitely has a certain entertainment value, but other than that... don't expect much from it.

Answer 8

Move to an island!

Answer 9

actually, this is a federal republic, not a democracy.

Answer 10

We are going to change you!!!!