how many of you out there can honestly can say you have ever bothered to research what?,and historicly where?

Question

the bible comes from with out just listening to what your paster tells u what is thruth and to just u never mind there all just sinners ,or nonbelievers,saitain ,evil,bad bad.i challange any christain to look for the oldest forms of the new testoment,the words my ,my,my not one story the same,nor are there,there any origonal writtings scrolls ect,ect,u are all fools as like my horrible spelling,and writting style,find truth thats what we were all taught. watch as u dig to find the answers,that they will shun u .i challenge any off u to take of the blinders of god and see reason .

Answer 1

huh???????????????yew neidz tu bea hucted ohn fonexz!!!

Answer 2

Reason doesn't necessarily mean blind faith in textbooks and Dan Brown novels, yes I've researched the origins of the Bible and was heartened to find that the Dead Sea Scrolls and other ancient documents closely match the modern translations. As for the familiar argument about not every Gospel being exactly the same; 1 If they were you'd attack them for being exactly the same and not expressing the different views of the different witnesses, 2 take 2 friends to see a movie this weekend and ask them to write a summary, separately, of the movie even though they saw the saw film they will write different accounts but will agree on major points.

Answer 3

I've never found one shred of evidence to support the existence of any god. The only reason that I am am interested is that nearly six billion people seem to accept the existence on faith. It is definitely a factor in the human race. Perhaps you should study to have good grammar or spelling before you come in here to cast aspersions about the intelligence of others, based only on your disagreement with their beliefs.

Answer 4

Gospel of Mark: +70 CE (conservative dating may be as early as 50)
Gospel of Matthew: +80-90 CE (conservative dating in the 60s)
Gospel of Luke: +80–90 CE (conservative dating in the 60s)
Gospel of John: +95–110 CE (conservative dating in the late 80s to early 90s)
Acts: +80–90 CE (conservative dating in 60s)
James: ca.70–200 CE (conservative dating ca.45–62 CE)
Colossians: +60 CE+
Corinthians: +57 CE
Ephesians: +65 CE
Hebrews: +60–90 CE
Epistles of John: +95-110 CE
Jude: +70–100 CE (conservative dating in the 60s or earlier)
First Peter: ca. 90–96 CE (conservative dating ca.64 CE)
Second Peter: 100–140 CE (conservative dating ca.64 CE)
Philemon: +56 CE
Philippians: +57–62 CE
Romans: +57–58 CE
Galatians: +54–55 CE (conservative dating in the late 40s)
Thessalonians: +50 CE
Timothy: +70–100 CE (conservative dating ca.60)
Titus: +70–100 CE (conservative dating ca.60)
Revelation: +81–96 CE (dating in the 60s as a minority view among conservatives)

Obviously the OT predates all New Testament material. Follow link to source to learn more.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dating_the_Bible

I have researched it and though the modern Jewish calendar is wrong, the events in the Bible can be substantiated back through Abraham, since he visited early ancient Egypt (ca 2500-3000BC), the Flood occurred about 1500 years before that according ot various religious worldwide documents and generations of Noah to Abraham (ca 4000-4500BC), this concludes that the world was created about 1500 years prior according to the generations of Adam to Noah and by going backwards along the timeline of population growth (ca 5500-6000BC) or appx 7500 -8000 years ago.

Because one can draw the conclusion that two population lines of descent existed Adam to everyone of Noah's time, and Noah to present population fossil evidence has to be looked at as two migrations which can clearly be seen in North America (Current Native Americans and a previous group who disappeared) and Europe (Neanderthals/Prehistoric Man and Current Europeans). Scientists conclude that the fossils of these people date from 10,000 BC to 30,000 BC and therefore disprove the Bible; WRONG, rather the Bible and population growth models conclude that fossil evidence has been incorectly dated.

This is why dinosaur fossils date from 65 to 300 million years ago and human fossils date from present to 2 million years ago. It has been recently theorized that fossilization was probably influenced by the Flood and that different bone densities and sizes show different records. Also it is suggested that since a fossil is merely limestone from the surrounding area filling the crevices of bones over time, a fossil will simply bear record of the date of the limestone plus the date of the fossil. Not to mention if the Earth was created 7500 years ago then all stratas existing at the moment should be considered to have started then therefore if the oldest rock is 7500 years ago this changes the entire dating system.

Answer 5

They can't answer the question so they attack the grammar, typical.

No they haven't done any research other than the bible, or read anything other than bible based research because there is no external evidence. That's why they always use circular arguments

Answer 6

It would help if you would get out of rant mode before composing your question. You realize your writing style is horrible, so grow some self respect and compose a few full sentences.

Answer 7

""shun u .i challenge any off u to take of the blinders of god and see reason .""


If ONLY you could type something in ENGLISH I could respond!

Answer 8

I found it very difficult to read your rambling and poorly put together question. Please make an effort next time, and use spell check.

Answer 9

cat say that i have or care. i beleave some and dont beleave other stuff.

Answer 10

What?