English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-07-07 11:36:05 · 19 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Military

19 answers

No he isn't kidding. Show me a law that says they cannot have a missile.

Whether you like it or not is not material.

I don't like Bush having the authority to launch nuclear weapons!!

PS we are not the law!!


"See, free nations do not develop weapons of mass destruction."
—So W., does this mean the U.S. is not a free nation?...
Source: The Chicago Sun-Times, Oct. 13, 2003

2006-07-07 11:49:04 · answer #1 · answered by cantcu 7 · 0 1

First of all, we're still at war with North Korea. You never want your enemy to build missles. Second Kim Jung Il is a power hungry nut. Because of his father, he honestly believes that he is holy and that the way he runs his country is the only right way. The worst part is that his sons are even crazier than he is, and slightly retarded.

The biggest thing though, is that China still backs North Korea. If North Korea fires a missle at any country, the US will have to go and take the country down. If China then backed North Korea, we would probably go into WW3. Just China and the US fighting would make WW2 look like a joke. It would be very devistating to every country involved. On top of that it could reallisticly evolve into a nuclear war. Nobody wants that. Not even China.

Truth is we will probably be at war with them in the next ten years, if not sooner.

2006-07-07 19:26:22 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Millions have starved RECENTLY to death in North Korea because the dear leader lives a life of extreme luxury - every grain of rice he eats is inspected by food inspectors - and everyone else is suffering and he only wants to do what all mentally ill people - like Hitler and Stalin - do, which is create havoc and destroy. He even abolished the calendar and started history in 1912, the year his father was born, so now it is the year 94 in North Korea. This is a man who should have nucular weapons aimed at Japan and America and Europe?

2006-07-07 18:51:09 · answer #3 · answered by oldbuckhorn 4 · 0 0

I asked the same question in a letter to the editor of the Seattle Times this morning:

To the Editor,



Unfortunately in this time of escalating crisis and as the world stands forever on the brink of total annihilation, our country stands on shaky ground with no credibility in asking any country to stay calm and act with restraint. As Mr. Bush chastises North Korea for launching weapons tests despite the wishes of the international community, I am reminded of the vigorous protests by millions of people all around the world on the eves of when the US was preparing for war against Iraq.

Protesters, entire nations, heads of state were all labeled “special interest groups” by Mr. Bush, and I can’t see how Kim Jong Il should feel like he should act any differently than Mr. Bush did in the run up to the Iraq war. In fact, I wouldn’t be surprised that Mr. Kim Jong Il declared pre-emptive war against the US with the amount of saber rattling and name calling that is going on today. We have been repeatedly told over the years that the US should not be beholden to the rest of the world to act in the interests of national security, and that pre-emptive war is the right strategy in the new world order. The US continues to defy international law, international treaties, and avoid international courts, why should any other nation feel they should act in accordance with the international community when George Bush flagrantly and haughtily dismisses it.

Until we start practicing what we preach in how we deal with the international community, we will encourage this kind of defiance and escalation as normal operating procedure from the most aggressive of foreign dictators. I am hoping that the leaders of our nation act responsibly and with restraint and with a deep desire for peace in the weeks and months to come.

2006-07-07 18:51:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know what schools some of you kids go to or don't you go to school. One day I hope you wake up into the real world if there's a world left for you to wake up to. Get out of those comic books and read what's going on in the real world and instead of answering these questions with assinine answers. Then just maybe you'll understand why some countrys are not and cannot be trusted, especially with nucular weapons. Wake up today in the real world or you may not wake up at all tomorrow.

2006-07-07 19:13:10 · answer #5 · answered by AL 6 · 0 0

Because Kim jong mentally ill is a very bad man. Why would a country that cant feed its people spend all that money on missles anyways?

2006-07-07 18:41:12 · answer #6 · answered by awrocksu 2 · 0 0

Are you seriously asking this question? Are you really that ignorant?
Okay, let me lay it down for you, in simple terms. Kim Jong is not a good man. He doesn't even try to do the right thing, not by his people, not by the world.
The problem is not that North Korea has these weapons. The problem is that they "tested" them by firing them at the US and Japan.
Does this answer your question?

2006-07-07 19:25:56 · answer #7 · answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7 · 0 0

Because they do not allow other nations to have their own belief systems. Their governmet party wants world domination. If they have the missle of mass descrution they could use it to make us behave the way the want us to. But other nations wiht the missles, don't want to shove our ideas, religion or way of life on them. We just want oil. LMAO

2006-07-07 18:40:29 · answer #8 · answered by heidinichole 4 · 0 0

Why is the US allowed to have them? The simple answer is: Because they can. What they want to do with them is another question.

Suppose that we are in the very same category they are, which we are, why doesn't the world impose sanctions on us?

2006-07-07 19:19:54 · answer #9 · answered by The Mrs. 1 · 0 0

For one thing, these arent just missiles....they are nuclear warheads.....and some are capable of reaching U.S. soil...Unless you want your children to be born into a country with the potential to be bombarded with Nuclear Warheads, then you should not want ANY country to have Nuclear Warheads..."CAPICHE?"

2006-07-07 19:08:38 · answer #10 · answered by T-Bone#1 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers