I the both were drowning at the same time who would you save first & does this mean you love one more thenthe other?
2006-07-07 10:07:58 · 29 answers · asked by IHave65Roses 1 in Family & Relationships ➔ Family
my children, if my husband never learned how to swim that's his fault. JJ still my boys are my life and my hubby would do the same I hope.
2006-07-07 10:13:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
They best not be drowning! They should all know how to swim! That said, IF they were all drowning, I'd save my babies first. And no, it doesn't mean i love them more than my husband. I think the feeling of love is different for children and spouses. Most people would give their lives for their children....it's a deep-rooted instict.
2006-07-07 17:59:22 · answer #2 · answered by SassySours 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The children. If I and my children were both drowning and my wife could only save me or them, I'd want my wife to save our children. I think most people would choose the same option.
Unless your children are evil, malicious, demons. Then I'd pick the spouse.
2006-07-07 17:10:56 · answer #3 · answered by montazmeahii 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We (My husband and I) agree that when it comes to the old, "Who do you save first?" question that we save the children. As parents we are called to be strong together and care for our children. Part of the love we have for one another is as parents and we will always protect the children.
But, saying that.... the love we have for each other must be nurtured and kept strong... not an issue for us. My hubby is my best friend. We are in this parenting thing together.
2006-07-07 17:26:00 · answer #4 · answered by beenthere 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In a real emergancy you don't have time to think ,you just react to the situation.Just look at people who come upon a fire or accident they react and do what is necessary.If they took time to think about the risks they would perhaps not take any action due to the risk for themself.In a real emergancy we can only hope we have the courage to do the right thing.
2006-07-07 18:37:43 · answer #5 · answered by gussie 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would save my children because they deserve a chance to experience life and children rock. Spouses come and go. Children give you love that is unconditional.
2006-07-07 17:14:24 · answer #6 · answered by Niki 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I always say safe whoever is nearest to you first CZ if the other was far away, what if u go to safe them first and by the time u get there is to late then by the time u get back to the one that was close by is also to late then u have lost two instead of one. So Safe whoever is closer. Husband or child but if worst come to worst, then I would probably safe my child.
2006-07-07 17:30:41 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
WOW this is a crazy question. If I could only save one either way my life would be ruined. If I lost my wife I would be devastated, if I lost my children I would be a ruined man. I hate even thinking about this, so my answer; I'm not going to answer. Sorry
2006-07-07 17:15:42 · answer #8 · answered by The Pooh-Stick Kid 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The children. Because they deserve a future. You can replace a spouse but not your kids. And it don't mean you love your spouse less. It's just kids must come first. As a parent it's your duty to protect them at all costs even if it means death of you or your partner.
2006-07-07 17:29:45 · answer #9 · answered by 2Kleen 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Children. Most spouses understand this.
2006-07-07 17:11:44 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
i would save my children first because their younger. No its doesnt mean u love 1 more then the other.
2006-07-07 17:12:56 · answer #11 · answered by .:BaBy J:. 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋