I am trying to figure out what women would prefer. Would yoy rather be rich, living in a big house, have a maid, a pool, fancy cars, a husband who is always working and be lonely? Or would you rather have a husband who was not rich, but always with you. Sleep on a beach in Mexico, stay in a hotel in Kansas City, sleep in a cabana in jamaica, that kind of stuff. I guess I'm asking if you would want all the monetary things and be trapped, or have only eachother and be free to go where you please.
2006-07-07 06:56:44 · 5 answers · asked by Flip Flop Pirate 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I would rather be poor and be free. Money doesn't buy love. Why have all those expensive things and have no one to share them with. When you could have the person you love enjoying everything with and never having to be lonely. I believe that when you leave this world you take what you've learned and the love you've gained in your heart not money and materialisitic things. So why base your life on money because money doesn't buy true and real love.
2006-07-07 07:02:07 · answer #1 · answered by babieshay27 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A guy that is always with me and would not be obsessed with money. I would rather have a poor guy that pays attention than a rich guy that dosent.
2006-07-07 13:59:40 · answer #2 · answered by Jessy 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
be with me, and travel, like sleep on the beach instead of paying for a hotel, that kinda stuff
2006-07-07 14:01:29 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Poor and free. When you die you can't take any of that fancy stuff with you. So live life free and enjoy it,. because once it's gone it's gone!
2006-07-07 14:00:31 · answer #4 · answered by ♥♥Soon to Be Mrs.F♥♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i HATE LONELINESS.i HOPE THIS EXPLAINS EVERYTHING TO YOU.
2006-07-07 14:02:08 · answer #5 · answered by ♥beautyfly♥ 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋