We know countries like Pakistan and Afghanistan are the main countries where Al Queda operate freely, so why are we not more actively at war there? Seek out and destroy them there, because its obvious the governments there are unwilling to do the job.
2006-07-07 06:54:23 · 16 answers · asked by jack f 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
To the first twelve answers (excluding one), duh! The one good answer so far, bravo!
2006-07-07 13:28:43 · update #1
Jack, I think you should be over there helping. We need enthusiastic people to join. Go Army.
2006-07-08 03:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by Daniel M 4 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Because then you fuel Al Queda. The citizens of that country will grow disgusted of the US attacking and will sympathize with Al Queda. Dipolmacy has to be used to gain permission to use target attacks against the terrorist camps. It seems kinda backward, but I look at it like this. "You don't fight a fire with gasoline."
2006-07-07 06:59:40 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
bush already tried that and he still there but al queda is now in another country
to go to attack where al queda goes means pulling out forces from where they all ready are and giving up the valuble resources provided by holding trhat country under usa power
besides bush has enough enimies
2006-07-07 07:01:21 · answer #3 · answered by mary mary quite contrary 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Obviously, you don't realize this, but there ARE foreign troops in Afghanistan, trying to find, and destroy al queda terrorists.Canadian troops are fired upon every day, and at least one a day gets hurt.
2006-07-07 07:00:57 · answer #4 · answered by judy_r8 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well attack France then
They sell their weapons to Al Queda
2006-07-10 06:43:57 · answer #5 · answered by HHH 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We do. We destroyed the Taliban, and still go after them. We installed a new pro US government there.
Pakistan is assisting us with battling Al Queda.
What else do you want to know?
2006-07-07 07:01:25 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
al-qaeda is an internationally organized terrorist group who is affiliated with nearly 250 terrorist groups worldwide. after US's Afghanistan operation it has changed its structure, planned by Zarqawi. now it has cells directly bound or not bound groups: it is a system called 'sleeping cells' worldwide. so there is no territory to destroy the new enemy. because it is an asymmetrical power.
2006-07-07 08:34:13 · answer #7 · answered by begum84 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
according to the news they are everywhere. They are in Europe, they are here. Did you see the video they showed yesterday on TV from the guy in England? They are there too so what country should we attack?
2006-07-07 06:58:15 · answer #8 · answered by antiekmama 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i imagine that if McCain turns into President he has plans to make certain terrorism does not spread, yet right this moment that is merely excellent for all applicants to go away that question on my own because the media will make a mockery of it. undergo in ideas the media makes money on condition that they stir the pot.
2016-11-01 09:24:36 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Simply because innocent people killed in two countries cannot be justified for fear of a group. If you have courage to find them and capture go ahead, but killing people randomly will make you a terrorist and them dead.
2006-07-07 07:01:19 · answer #10 · answered by kalabalu 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's all political.
If it wasn't for politics, and we just let the Generals run the war, we would probably have won by now.
2006-07-07 08:14:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋