Do you think Bush Should Be Impeached?

Question

Under Bush administration logic, these tactics were not illegal under U.S. law because U.S. law was trumped by the law of war, and they weren't illegal under the law of war either, because Geneva Convention prohibitions on torture and cruel treatment were not applicable to the conflict with Al Qaeda.

But the real blockbuster in the Hamdan decision is the court's holding that Common Article 3 of the Geneva Convention applies to the conflict with Al Qaeda — a holding that makes high-ranking Bush administration officials potentially subject to prosecution under the federal War Crimes Act.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-brooks30jun30,0,339573.column?coll=la-home-headlines

Don't forget that he signed treaty's and called them agreements to make Mexico, USA, and Canada one economy above our constitiution and beyond review of our Supreme Court.

http://www.impeachbush.tv/

Assuming they do away with the minimum wage (besides the UN resolutions now being discussed to disarm people defending themselves even in their own homes and could be prosecuted for it) how many Amero's should we ask to work for, and please keep in mind the SPP laws will say that businesses are required to hire foreign nationals above citizens (or whatever we're called after 2010).

http://www.immigrationwatchdog.com/?p=1453

Maybe yes, maybe no..
BUT SPP HAS GOT TO GO!!!

If single handedly signing over your soveriegnty and rights to other countries isn't impeachable and treasonous, I don't know what is.

Emichoice: I have thought about it, and your response is one sided. How good do you consider a president tht signs your sovereingty and rights away to foriegn nationals?

Answer 1

It is actually a very serious situation, and I doubt if most people on this site are sufficiently informed about what's going on .. yes, the UN is again trying to ban our guns ... and I haven't seen much about that in the media ... it is as you say ... if you call treaties "agreements" ... your hands are pretty much tied ... and yes, after 2010 we can kiss goodbye to our soverignty ... if I understand everything correctly ... scary ...

Answer 2

No, he should not be impeached for being a good politician, after all if he wasn't, would we have put him in office in the first place. We have our checks and balance system that should allow for us to get the appropriate laws into place. We the people have the right to our opinions and so does our president. The house has the right to reject any laws that is not in the best interest of the American people. Who decides the best interest of the American people? We do. How? By voting. By not getting distracted on issues that is not important and focusing on what is most important to us. If the security of our country is what is most important, well after 911, I would say, our president did an excellent job. Notice we have not been bombed ever since. We can never be perfect, however we should make every effort to be consistent. If we decide not to be consistent and cry about someone breaking our laws after they have done so for decades, then who’s fault is that. It is simple, do something about it. Put your money or vote where your mouth is. This is not about being racist, and ignorant and intolerant. It is about not playing the look at them over their game; when we want attentions to be taken off of our poor decisions and us. It is about ownership and resolution. If we impeach our president, what should we do about the other presidents who have allowed this to go on, prior to Bush? Let's not be rash in our thinking. The problem is easy to be solved, we stick with our laws that we put into place and then follow through with it, to ensure everyone is following it. We don’t reward anyone for breaking the laws, that will not solve anything but make us and our laws jokes to the rest of the world. The illegal who are already here, we should systematically deport them over a period of time because our laws says, if you are illegal then you will be deported. Just because you want something really bad, it doesn’t mean you should get it at all cost. I want to have a million dollars, because I want a better life for my self, does this mean I should go and steal it. Absolutely not. Don’t blame the people because we have not done our jobs. We should be pointing the finger at ourselves. If we decide to stop putting people in jail who kill, then I dare say it, there would be a drastic increase in murders. Think about it......

Answer 3

No, Bush did not committ the atrocities that a handful of soldiers did. Bush should be honored for his commitment to fight the war on terror even when a number of spineless citizens don't have the courage to attempt something that is hard and sometimes painful. I say give Bush a third term.

Answer 4

Yes and then arrested for his crimes against humanity. My dream is to have the camera's on him when they drag him and his cabinet down the white house steps wearing hand cuffs and leg irons and a orange jump suit on their way to the Hague to trial for these horrific acts that he has done.

Answer 5

Yesterday!

Answer 6

Yes.

He took an oath to protect our laws and Constitution. He didn't.

Answer 7

yes

Answer 8

Nope he has done nothing for which he should be impeached

Answer 9

no, it's rediculous; its the left's way of stirring up votes from the ill-informed.

Answer 10

I am starting to feel that he does!!!!!!.........something is wrong with that boy, I cant fully understand his reasoning.