so that pervs like you can oogle at them
2006-07-06 23:56:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yeah it is retarded, since women did the boobs become not highly sexual and if you are showing that much, a man is going to get very distracted and aroused like the nips are showing. If a woman goes to the beach in a little sticker and g string and worries about her nipples showing, I'm seriously going to question her intelligence. Or how about in pictures or TV where a woman is bending over and wearing butt floss and has the most amazing ***, shows like nip/tuck that is like soft porn without the nipples and a naked ***. Somehow this is all fine, but self censorship is important to cover the nipples lol. I'm sorry but a boy is going to be very aroused with even if it's simulated and not real, but a man humping a woman's naked *** bent over is not going to make a boy highly aroused just because the nipple aren't shown but everything else is. T his obscenity thing is not consistent if you ask me, it's one think if a woman is in a bikini or even skimpy and the nipples aren't shown. But it's another thing if she is 98% naked and just millimeters from her nipples showing and has great *** and is shown *** naked. Some how a naked *** is more appropriate than naked ****. Call me crazy, since when did boobs because more sexually arousing than a nice ***. For the longest time all I have heard was T AND A, not just T, which means men love a naked *** or find it just as arousing as naked boobs. Or liking them pretty evenly or just *** much *** men as boob men. It's like the logic of saying a boy can't drink soda, because it's bad for him, but you give him or buy him cereal that is loaded with sugar. Maybe soda is worse, but is it really that much worse? If you go that far I don't see what nipples show, especially considering, while men loves nipples, men also loves the breast tissue, especially when that much shown is shown as nipples and *** as much as nipples or boobs. A woman's body is not one dimensional, so men loves other parts just as much or find sexually arousing. I would think sexual attractiveness would override shock value, because that is why nipples can't be shown when every other inch, because like I said if it was on the sexual arousal basis, other parts should not shown to the extent that they are. The logic is really lacking when you put this all together. Cool-so a sticker isn't going to have a man salivating or a nice naked ***? That's why I say it defeats the purpose when they go as far as they go to show to much. Like I said a nice bare *** is going to get a man salivating just as much as naked boobs (meaning the nipples showing), yet for some reason the rest can be shown. N.B Jones, has a one dimensional attraction women apparently. I don't understand this, what are nipples without the nice jugs they sit on and have you ever squeezed or fondled a woman's boobs while have doggy style sex, then you would know the boobs are just as special and on that same token you would know how great a nice *** is just as much as nipples.
2016-03-27 07:45:09
·
answer #2
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
You were tight tops to keep everything in place. It is not comfortable having all the bouncing around. It actually hurts and they do a lot of bouncing.
You can't control when your nipples harden. Mine stay hard. Doesn't mean I am horny or trying to get attention, just sensitive nipples.
2006-07-07 00:00:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by pretty_brown_eyes 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think it is as bad as you describe it. Female athletes must wear a sprots bra to allow maximum movement. Female usually don't think of their chest as being a viewing distraction but more likely as a distraction to there own game. So you are probably wrong if you think female athletes use their sexually to make them better or popular seeing that they are most likely to be competeing against other females. It's all in the eye of the beholder but this is probably closer to reality. Sorry.
2006-07-07 00:16:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by pico 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Why else would a normal guy ever watch tennis?
2006-07-07 00:10:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by I'manalienfrog 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Alert - small annoying little boy using another of his log-ins to ask another ridiculous question - hopefully his mummy will be along to call him for teatime soon.
2006-07-07 00:01:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jaws 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
tighter clothes are more aerodynamic. That could help them run faster. Plus they don't have clothes flapping around them.
2006-07-07 04:12:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by King Mark I 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Watch the game and not the Bod.
2006-07-07 00:01:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by ks_anand_77 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
yes,,a good question,,,just look at equal rights ,,whats happened ? .look at it this way honeys ...if women are to show their titty boobs,,,, lets have the men show us their meat and two veg,,,im a gay man and i wanna see more of the male sex organs...hehe....love davinia.xxx
2006-07-07 07:34:31
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
who the hell will watch tennis then
2006-07-07 04:50:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by joypinkmail 2
·
1⤊
0⤋