We know that the terorist not all coming from Muslim. Non-Muslim have their terrorist, too. Why don't you call them Christian terorrist or some other terrorist that related to the some specific religions. It's sound like a propaganda for me or just like pouring honey into a bowl of war?
2006-07-06 20:51:59 · 10 answers · asked by Two-tea 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I need more personal opinion, out of media intervention or by government.
2006-07-06 23:58:07 · update #1
I need more personal opinion, out of media intervention or by government.
2006-07-07 00:01:08 · update #2
I agree. We shouldn't use the religion when describing terrorists. I don't care what religion you are, I'm pretty positive god didn't intend for terrorists.
2006-07-06 20:55:58 · answer #1 · answered by jdc591 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We do hear this a lot. But in relation to this war, that's because most of the terrorists are Muslim. Not to say that most, or all Muslims are terrorists. (Definitely not.)
But if you've been keeping in touch with what some of the "Muslim terrorists" are saying, it's basically that they want to spread their religion, and they're doing it in a violent way. That's why (at least from what I understand) they say "Muslim terrorists" instead of just "terrorists."
On the news and elsewhere, I haven't heard of terrorists of other religions trying to spread it in this kind of way. So there'd really be no point in saying if a terrorist was Christian, Muslim or Buddhist if it has no relation to their crime.
I have also heard the term "radical Muslim terrorist" to defferentiate between Muslims and the terrorists that are Muslim. Also, if you listen to some of the Muslims (and I mean non terrorist, peace loving people) talk about their religion and what some of the "Muslim terrorists" are doing, you'll see that it's not just a term used by people trying for propoganda.
Hope that helped!
2006-07-07 04:04:11 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Look at who owns the main stream media and you'll have your answer! A few examples (which will get me flamed I'm sure) OK city weren't called terrorists (altho MSM did at first report muslim terrorists did it). On 9/11 the white van of muslim militants (that turned out to be Israeli's). Remember the terrorist's blowing up churches across the south? Two jewish kids (and end of MSM coverage of the story).
Is that enough or should I go on?
2006-07-07 04:14:55 · answer #3 · answered by departed lime wraith 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because it is simply facing reality, which some people have a hard time with, being politically correct. The question should be; When's the last time that you heard of a terrorist that WASN'T Muslim?
2006-07-07 04:03:32 · answer #4 · answered by Ken W 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A terroist is a terrorist and by any other name is still a terrorist. But Muslim terrorist wanted to make a name for themselves and they certainly did that.
2006-07-07 04:00:56 · answer #5 · answered by Mcduff 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Believe that no religion order to make a terror to community. Who give a name "muslim" to a certain group of terrorist ? They are who use the name muslim on their name, and then do terror are NOT REPRESENTATIVE of all muslim. They are criminal. Not related with religion even if they use the name muslim.
2006-07-07 04:32:05 · answer #6 · answered by Deedee 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
OK when the Lutheran terroists fly a plane into a building or the Buddist terroists strap bombs to their kids and have them blow up bystanders (they did this during viet nam war but thats beside the point) then I will gladly call a spade a spade.
2006-07-07 03:57:52 · answer #7 · answered by dr strangelove 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's probably because muslim terrorists say that they kill and destroy in the name of Islam.(???)As we all know this is not a true reason.But I've never heard a Christian terrorist killing for spreading Christianity.They do for other reasons.No matter what your reason i think all terrorists are same and universal.They all speak the language of terror.
2006-07-07 04:27:23 · answer #8 · answered by eniyikul 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I say islamic terrorist, but they claim to be muslims and the whole thing is all about their religion. The suicide/homicide bombers claimed to be killing people for their Allah,their God, so why call them anything else. They are muslim jihadist!!!
It is what it is.
2006-07-07 06:43:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
1st it was 'the Russians'... Now it's the Muslims that are going to kill us! I can't wait to see who will be next... Probably 'the Aussies' (I mean, they did launch a lot of fireworks for the Olympics... could they be construed as 'Weapons of Mass Destruction'?)... I can just see it, 'the Muslims' are all supposed to be 'suicide bombers' NOW we will have 'Suicide Skippy's'!
"Thank God/Allah... we have the honest blair & bush, to protect us" ???
"Good answers guys"... Your murdering president will be proud of you...
" I see 'the Sheep' are all present and correct (and as NAIVE as ever)!!!
2006-07-07 04:02:30 · answer #10 · answered by HackneyDemon 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋