English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

He's definately a liberal when it comes to spending money and big government and everything he's said about the Iraq war has been an outright lie.

2006-07-06 19:56:15 · 8 answers · asked by jack r 1 in Politics & Government Government

From a true republican...yes I am!

2006-07-06 19:56:33 · update #1

8 answers

Don't try to push him off onto the other side, now that you don't want to take the hit at election time! He is all yours, and you're welcome to him.

2006-07-06 21:12:15 · answer #1 · answered by Nosy Parker 6 · 1 4

Believe me, if the sycophants that pass themselves off as "press" even catch wind of anything resembling real WMD's it would be top headlines for a week. I just watched the anchors on CNN Europe this morning completely grovel for 10 minutes about how Bush is such a nice guy that works out, blah blah blah. I really thought they were pundits for a minute, but it turns out they're regular anchors. Meanwhile, two big stories and another abusive soldier story have been completely buried by them.

Did anyone in the US know that the new Italian PM just busted 20 CIA agents for kidnapping, illegal rendition, and torture? How much coverage to the Israeli military assault on populated areas of Gaza, rounding up and jailing 25 of their ELECTED OFFICIALS just to recover some nerdy kid that's probably been long dead.

I guess the "liberal media" just sort of forgot about these on-going stories. I'm telling you right now, the "liberal media" is a MYTH. There is NO LIBERAL MEDIA. The "bad news" you see about Bush, which is just as quickly buried ("Here, have another dead white chick kidnapped by evil foreigners"), is only so they can cover their asses before moving on to the next story. The reason why you don't hear about "good news in Iraq" is BECAUSE THERE IS NONE, except that the oil fields are up to about 50% capacity...way to go Halliburton!

2006-07-06 20:33:12 · answer #2 · answered by lostinromania 5 · 0 0

As a Republican I agree that he has been liberal when it comes to spending money. I disagree about Iraq though. Weapons of mass destruction have been found, but the press doesn't want you to know that. I do disagree on HOW we are fighting the war. We need to get in there, and get it over with without worrying that we might "offend" someone. This is a war. Sometimes I wish I were an Independent.

2006-07-06 20:14:24 · answer #3 · answered by C's mom 2 · 0 0

Bush isn't perfect but he was the best choice at the time of the election. Last time I checked, Bush wasn't running this country on his own. We have a Senate and Congress that have to go along with Bush's leadership in order to get things done. Bush has to take the best options available based on support from the legislature. Unfortunately, the American people are guilty of electing idiots like Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, John Murtha, Nancy Pelosi, and many more, over and over again!

When it comes to the war the liberals are responsible for prolonging it and dishonoring the United States with their filthy lies, and lack of support for our troops. See names listed above!

2006-07-06 22:31:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It took over 40 years for the republican party to gain control of the senate and congress,and in less than 5 years George W Bush by going against his own party and aligning himself with the likes of Ted Kennedy and Harry Reid on immigration has cause republican to go against republican,He is the main reason republicans will most likely lose the senate and congress.History will point him as the democrats best weapon against the republicans

2006-07-06 20:16:03 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Too many Republicans are making too much money from the Bush presidency for any of them to question anything that George Bush does. The money that the Bush Administration is spending, who do you think "gets" it ???? Rich Republicans is your answer. Bush is NOT about politics, he is about money.

Sorry to those Republicans who actually think that politics maters. Its just money. God save our beloved nation from such greed.

2006-07-06 20:09:21 · answer #6 · answered by dondee31 2 · 0 0

Come on- partisanship is ugly on both sides of the aisle. I don't care if it's the Dems or Repubs- both parties have been bastardized and sullied.
I used to be a repub but now I am independent!

2006-07-06 20:04:10 · answer #7 · answered by cigarnation 3 · 0 0

I think, even as you mentioned you are a Republican that he has his loyalties. And by the time he is done, he could ruin the Republican party. You won't see me crying after they've followed him blindly.

2006-07-06 20:00:32 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers