There is overwhelming evidence that Bin-Laden had nothind to do with the attack, the two buildings were brought down with demolitions, a small plane or a missle hit the pentagon, and no sky scraper has ever collapsed because of fire.
2006-07-06 18:38:50 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Can I have some of your pot?
2006-07-06 18:42:42 · answer #1 · answered by ODST 2 · 5⤊ 0⤋
others are right, this is not technically a question. However, the evidence is definitely there for people to draw their own conclusions as to what happened. Have a close look at the video of the tower, the smoke that engulfs the towers before they collapse is like a mist, used as a smoke screen to hide pre planted explosive devices. This was a possible back up in case the planes did not acheive their objective. Steel melts at a certain temp. which is very high. Jet fuel, wood and plastic all burn at a much lower heat. Therefore there was not enough heat to melt the steel supports that held the tower. Wiping out the hundreds of financial powerhouses that called wtc. home was in the interests of many powers from all parts of the globe.Ultimately you have to go with what you believe, but do your homework.
2006-07-07 01:49:03 · answer #2 · answered by jukeandjive 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, so if the buildings were brought down with demolitions and a small plane or missle hit the pentagon, where did the 3 airplanes with all of the passengers go?
2006-07-07 01:43:05 · answer #3 · answered by islandgirl92075 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
When they said freedom of seech they meant freedom of popular speech. Can you repost the link ?
If you upset the state sponsered truth you will be unpopular. Fortunately you live in the US and thats all that will happen to you.
You know very well that the FBI CIA and all the rest of the security forces out there either knew , allowed or did it themselves. The US government killed it's own people in exchange it got a blank check to impose domestic security measures and foriegn wars and no one would question.
This was an inside job.Yes .
Bin Laden is the perfect enemy he only goes places where the government wants to bomb and no one can find him. Satilite images that I can download from the internet show a boat in the harbour ...............can you imagine what the Armed Forces get to play with? They can't find one crazy Arab? That seems highly unlikely doesn't it?
2006-07-07 01:55:42 · answer #4 · answered by Trout 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ok, so who devised this evil attack on our country? cause you can say it was a demolition but all these advents took place at the same time. So who then, if not the terrorist , who only a few years ago had the same plan to take down the twin towers?
2006-07-07 01:49:10 · answer #5 · answered by doesitmatter 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, how many skyscrapers where hit by planes loaded down with jet fuel. Only one level collapsed tho on each building, but that is all that is needed for domino effect.
And the pentagon is stout building, it is very ahrd to damage.
2006-07-07 01:43:54 · answer #6 · answered by WhiteHat 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ah, the old tried and true conspiracy theory. So who did it then? Bush? And I suppose all of congress has no problem with this? Or do you really think Bush could hide it from even those he works with? And I suppose the people who died in the plane crashes are all part of the conspiracy, too...man that was some planning!! Not to mention all of the set up with the insurgency in Iraq and all the suicide bombers, wow they really thought of everything didn't they?
2006-07-07 01:44:16 · answer #7 · answered by someguy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are living in a fantasy land!
Were you there?
I doubt it!
Do you believe every conspiracy theory that you see in a movie or read on the Internet?
I bet you do!
What you labeled as a "Question about 9/11.?"
did not contain a question or a question mark (?)
All it did contain was an ignorant statement!
2006-07-07 01:41:05 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if bin laden was in the attacks on 9/11 he would now be a little bit of dust blowing in the wind. that guy should be flushed.
2006-07-07 01:43:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's crap like this that makes me angry. If you truely believe this, you are sadly mistaken. To tell me that 3000+ people died and that it was all a lie is just sick. Where were you on that day, in a cave somewhere in the middle east? You need help. Thats all I'm going to say since what I want to say would just be reported.
2006-07-07 01:45:11 · answer #10 · answered by crazy_airforce_guy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Overwhelming evidence", you wish! Man didn't walk on the moon, Kennedy wasn't shot, Elvis is still alive and the Holocaust didn't happen! Hi, Kenny! Got'cha! Ha!
2006-07-07 01:45:14 · answer #11 · answered by coorissee 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋