CARRY in spite of not being able to conceive..
2006-07-06 18:23:49 · 13 answers · asked by Cheryl C 1 in Health ➔ Women's Health
yes. tubal ligation cuts and cauterizes/caps the tubes. If you can get Invitro fertilization, you can carry. They tubal has nothing to do with your uterus and cervix.
2006-07-06 18:26:01 · answer #1 · answered by Starry 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you can still conceive there are many documented cases of the fallopian tubes growing back together, and a woman concieving carrying to term and delivering.As far as carry, if nothing is wrong with the uterus, you would be able to carry to term. i think artificial implantation may be possible as well after tubal ligation. You would have to be evaluated by a fertility specialist.
2006-07-06 18:29:27 · answer #2 · answered by silverwaif77 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is completely possible to carry a child after a tubal ligation
and if your like my sister it's possible to concieve 2nd child after a "irreversible" tubal to have a second "irreversible" tubal to concieve a 3rd child. But I guess there was enough scar tissue after the 3rd time that she's no longer able to concieve
2006-07-06 19:18:55 · answer #3 · answered by paschen81 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't see why not. The fetus is carried in the uterus, not in the fallopian tubes. There have been many women that have carried babies for other women that either cannot conceive, have had a TL & changed their mind about having a child, or their partner is unable to produce children. So I would say definately YES.
2006-07-06 18:28:40 · answer #4 · answered by Borinquena 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reversal expenses $3-8000 and is ninety 5% effectual if there is adequate tube. A microsurgeon has to study the documents to make certain even if that is a possibility. being pregnant fulfillment is seventy 5%, yet there is also an more beneficial cost of ectopic. insurance does not conceal this. Your in ordinary words different selection is IVF which isn't coated by using insurance because your spouse changed into voluntarily sterilized and not in any respect because she had maximum cancers or a hereditary ailment. it quite is really severe priced, yet maximum persons merely get a 2d pastime for awhile to pay for it. there is not any vast difference in wearing the toddler. The uterus is undamaged and the ovaries proceed to emit hormones.
2016-11-01 08:42:53 · answer #5 · answered by winstanley 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes. The tubal prevents pregnancy by not allowing the eggs to move down the fallopian tubes. Everything else still works.
2006-07-06 18:27:04 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
As long as the woman is healthy, doesn't have any reproductive problems, and hasn't experienced menopause then carrying a full-term pregnancy shouldn't be a problem.
2006-07-06 18:27:08 · answer #7 · answered by Jen Diamond 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes a woman can carry, the fetus is located in the uterus of course. the road is detoured just can concieve anymore the natural way.
2006-07-07 01:04:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course. Your eggs can still be harvest, artificially inseminate, then placed in the uterus. Or the eggs could come from a donor.
2006-07-06 18:31:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, with artificial insemination. No fallopian tubes required! As long as u don't have any complications involving ur uterus.
2006-07-06 18:27:53 · answer #10 · answered by dreamsailor 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋