Is it OK for the U.S. to have nuclear weapons but to reprimand other countries for it? Justify your answer.
2006-07-06 18:16:46 · 5 answers · asked by rumilb 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
We believe it is safer that way,that's why we-the british decided it was the right thing to do-look at the egomaniac running Korea !- But I'm afrain this religeous zeal is a far greater threat to humanity at present-it's the terrorist's,and no one else causing mayhem-fear is contagious and negative to the extreme-we have the choices over our own destiny not that of others-if we are free-the road to hell is paved with good intentions-it's time to think again before we have a religious war -greater in it's distructive capability than any nuke could ever have,love thy neighbour,were good word's.ktf.x
2006-07-07 00:01:45 · answer #1 · answered by Tommy D. 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋
The entire situation in which America has invaded Iraq because of "their possession of nuclear weapons" can be parallelled to the Minority Report movie. Firstly, no weapons were found. Second, they are claiming that this nuclear knowledge will be used for the worst.
How can the U.S. deliver an autonomous decision on what should be done to one country? They can't. The more countries that work together for a solution, the better-hopefully less biased- that solution will be.
2006-07-07 01:47:17 · answer #2 · answered by Kerry 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell ya, because we are not threatening other countries, America is better than a lot of other places and we are just as not ******* stupid.
2006-07-07 04:17:40 · answer #3 · answered by Dawn M 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I cannot answer this question because there is no justifiable one.
2006-07-07 01:20:50 · answer #4 · answered by Steven D 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes it is OK. We have only used it for peace. They would use it for war.
2006-07-07 01:22:34 · answer #5 · answered by scavenger_meat 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋