English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My friend and I made a bet. I said being rich is better! She said being famous is better! So I want to take a survey which is better..

2006-07-06 16:14:14 · 26 answers · asked by ♥Chamillitary Amberleé♥ 5 in Entertainment & Music Polls & Surveys

Okays guys.. But what about the celebrites? If you was famous, you woukld be going to artist's platinum parties, be hanging out with your celebrity crush..

If you was rich, you would be at the mall spending your money on the new dress you being eyeing on or you would be staring at that CD or DVD by your favorite rapper..

2006-07-07 05:20:32 · update #1

Thank you guys for your time! Tomorrow July 8,2006, I will tally the votes and announce the answer and will pick the best answer! :)

2006-07-07 12:47:16 · update #2

26 answers

Thanks for the Answer!!!!

But to answer your question...
I was very very very popular in high school and being "famous in High School" is like being famous for reals. If you are desperate to have people love you, then cool. I'd rather be filthy rich. I have ENOUGH friends. You can't become unfamous...I still have enemies from High School because I was that mean, evil popular person that you see in the movie. (watch jawbreakers...that is me and my friends) You can buy fame once you are rich. Look at Paris Hilton, Nicole Ritchie, Hilary and her sister Hay, Brittney Spears(she had to make it so that she could become infamous). So how much do you wanna be famous?

2006-07-07 09:27:20 · answer #1 · answered by twentysexxy79 1 · 1 3

Being famous WITHOUT money is the worst thing that can happen to anyone. Just ask everyone that has ever done a reality show. People know them but they have NO MONEY and everyone assumes that you are rich because you were on TV.
Being Rich and unknown is the best.

2006-07-06 16:18:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Firstly you are not going to get any good information from a book that demonizes the occult. The writers of those books are controlled by the Christian religion and know absolutely nothing about the occult. They are just regurgitating what they were taught by their pastor and parents. Their parents did the same thing. And then their parents parents. It goes on like that, all the way back to the 3rd century AD, and from generation to generation, all the way to the year 2015, the occult has been demonized and lied about by the Christian church. There really isn't a big movement of teenagers who study the occult. Sorry my friend, but the Ouija board has nothing to do with the occult. In fact most magicians shake their head in disgust when people think that they use the Ouija board. Teenagers don't study the occult mainly because studying the occult really is "studying". It's hard work, kind of like splitting fire wood. Very few teenagers are going to have the patience and drive to study the occult. The occult is not like you think. Your church has completely lied to you about it. It's really sad, because many Christians might actually be missing out on what they are really looking for, and that is deep cleansing and enlightenment, something that can never be found in a fear based religion. That's the truth. You can never, never find liberty in a fear based religion. You can follow that religion for a billion years, and you will never find freedom. Occultists know this. In fact, many in your church secretly study the occult. They know the occult has nothing to do with Satan, which is why they are able to do it but still maintain a relationship with the Christian God.

2016-03-27 07:22:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Id rather be rich and unknown, given that i became rich from something that i worked hard on. That way, i could keep all the money for myself, family and friends. What will i do with fame if i dont have money?

2006-07-06 17:32:14 · answer #4 · answered by lilac 3 · 0 0

Honestly, being rich and unknown if preferable. Who wants to be famous during these hectic times? For some reason there are many people who consider celebrities public property and do what they please to them, such as sneaking into celebrity homes for photographs. Tabloids are the worst. Who on earth would want the world to read about their dirty laundry in Star Magazine?

2006-07-06 16:25:59 · answer #5 · answered by pinacoladasundae 3 · 0 0

Rich and unknown has to be better. If you're broke and famous, it does u no good whatsoever. Besides being embarassing as hell, anybody who is famous and broke is probably broke from doing something embarassingly stupid. So there's a good chance that that person is a nitwit.

2006-07-06 16:21:52 · answer #6 · answered by allstarcharles 2 · 0 0

i think being rich without being famous is better because when ur famous, ppl know you and can do stuff to you. i rather be unknown and keep all the money.

2006-07-06 18:41:27 · answer #7 · answered by maya 3 · 0 0

Rich and unknown

2006-07-06 16:55:27 · answer #8 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 0 0

If your Broke but famous
people would know who you are.

But if your rich and unknown you could help the poor and feed the hungry.

So I'm 50/50

2006-07-06 16:29:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous 3 · 0 0

Rich is better.. you dont have fake friends to beg and borrow your money. and when you're famous and you get tired of the attention after a while....

2006-07-06 16:19:09 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers