English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

6 answers

I think George W. Botch is a spoiled toddler who is in desperate need for attention. Of course it doesn't help that the boot licking UK is supporting his tantrums and Caesar delusions. I really think that he was told to do this by Chaney(the real President)that is is a provocation of war so that they can harm public opinion of N. Korea even greater so that they can be justified in invading another nation and try to take over the world. The US government government is so evil. And greatly stupid too.

You can go on for days with that. They were right. They needed missiles to defend against a US 1st strike which Nightline even admits was worked on at one point. Was not not the reason for Regan's Star Wars missiles in space plan? Oh, I know. Regan figured if he could control space, the US could control the World. You can swing the door both ways on that. Smart as a garden slug neocons never seem to get that and that is why the door always flies back and smack them in the face.

2006-07-06 15:54:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I think North Korea is posturing to get international attention back on them and bring some of the Powers together to talk about alternatives. I don't think showing them no respect and making fun of their leader, no matter how bad he may be, is the answer. Half the country is under nourished from what I've seen and finding some way to balance things out, if thats possible, where they might actually back off on the building of their military in order to make sure the people have a chanc at being healthy and having at least a half decent standard of living is important.

I know that its hard for any of the worlds major leaderships to back away from using harsh words and flaunting power, but we've seen so much of this same stuff in the past. Huge powerful militaries whise the general population suffered to a great degree. What would at least appear to be paranoid type leaders, etc.

I guess what I'm trying to say is that we should work harder to convince NK that the US doesn't want to invade them. Why would we? If they started nuclear war they could be vaporized and everyone knows it. The sad thing is that as long as solutions are sought in a military context, its the people there who will continue to suffer and be the real victims of it all. I wrote too much here but thanks for your patience if you read all this.

2006-07-06 16:00:53 · answer #2 · answered by Jim R 1 · 0 0

I just read some information on that situation. I dont think it's a bad idea for them to develop missles, it wouldnt be a bad idea if we were Allied, are we Allied with North Korea?

2006-07-06 15:37:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

US and South Korean intelligence have reported that there has been alot of unusual pastime at missile web content and they seem to have relocated a nuclear armed missile in route of their east coast that could placed it in firing distance of united statesbases in the pacific which contain guam, japan, and obviously south korea. the U. S. does have 2 destroyers there one among which i believe is armed with the technologies to intercept and spoil a missile if it does take position to be released.

2016-11-01 08:29:53 · answer #4 · answered by belschner 4 · 0 0

I think Kim Jung IL is a spoiled toddler who is in desperate need for attention. Of course it doesn't help that China is supporting his tantrums. I really think that he was told to do this by China so that they can harm public opinion of America even greater so that they can try to take over the world. Chinese government is so evil.

2006-07-06 15:37:29 · answer #5 · answered by nicole 3 · 0 0

People should be allowed to have missiles, and threaten whoever they want with them.

2006-07-06 15:38:29 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers