I've always thought that if it were me, we'd switch off. That's just what I would love to do. But who knows? I'd love to see stats on that sort of thing. I never thought about it like that before, like who actually does that. I though that my thoughts about doing it were kind of unusual. I'm glad to see someone else is thinking about it. :)
2006-07-06 14:42:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Sarah 3
·
9⤊
3⤋
Whose existence has been torn up the following? the youngster or the figure? the protection of those children is shipped into astonishing turmoil from which they couldn't in any respect recuperate. i'm particular that both dad and mom love their organic children yet to boot love the switched baby. Had this been got here upon at a million or 2 years it will be a lot a lot less demanding for the youngster yet now the scarring which will probably take position is horrendous. to respond to your question. certain- she who gave beginning to the youngster is the mummy and certain she who raised that kid is likewise the mummy. Legally, the courtroom made the right selection, Morally, emotionally, in my opinion- i don't believe of so. each and every mom seen the youngster whom she raised to be her very own flesh and blood. As one among the different answerers reported- I do wish those households can artwork together and mend as many damaged lives as available for the youngster's sake.
2016-11-01 08:25:54
·
answer #2
·
answered by belschner 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the couple. Most relationships have one woman bear the child. Unless they both had dreams of actually having their own child. So it's not for sure either way. Just depends.
2006-07-06 14:26:58
·
answer #3
·
answered by Holls 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
there was a documentary on two gay men who found a surrogate mother. SHe bore a child for each of them.
Personally, pretty sure I don't like kids, and if I DO want a family, I'll adopt. There's nothing so friggin' great about MY genetics that they need to get passed on (family history of cancer, diabetes, depression; why bother?). Also, I don't see why I should bring another child into the world at the direct expense of someone else who needs a home?
2006-07-07 11:31:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Atropis 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well in my case my partner carried our son and if we were to have more children in the future she was going to carry those also. But she decided after ten years it was time to return to a man.
2006-07-06 15:22:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by rablmb35 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know a couple who is working on their second child right now. One had their first child and the other is trying to get pregant with the second.
2006-07-06 14:28:59
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
You mean switch bearing the child during pregnancy? Umm that is not possible
2006-07-06 15:52:25
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good question! And I can't really give you an answer, but I would think that it would be one woman, that does it all! But i guess that depends on the couple!
2006-07-06 14:28:04
·
answer #8
·
answered by munkypoo1 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Depends on the couple
2006-07-06 16:38:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Intuit Birth 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
normally only one bears the child. but either could if they wished
2006-07-06 14:26:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋