English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Can the human body of an individual person be considered a brane? What type would it be and would there be any limitations on the number of dimensions it could occupy?

2006-07-06 14:05:08 · 9 answers · asked by eric henderson 2 in Science & Mathematics Physics

No, I don't mean "brain". The question is correct as it is spelled.

2006-07-09 11:22:10 · update #1

9 answers

Time and Space are conceptual. Even this world is imaginary.

Please read the following book.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0791413640/qid=1152304319/sr=2-1/ref=pd_bbs_b_2_1/103-1016054-7543827?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

Read that ancient scripture. It talks everything about blackholes, time travel, particle-wave theory, aliens, consciousness, mind, matter, energy, creation, cosmic dissolution, unified theory, psychology etc.

Everyone should read it atleast once in their lifetime.

It will liberate you for sure!

I guarantee it will change your life. Those who don't read it or cannot access it and follow it are really unlucky. Salutations to them. Those who can read it and follow it are great. Salutations to them.

2006-07-07 09:59:50 · answer #1 · answered by Kamaraj S 1 · 0 0

The answer to your question is not as simple as the way you asked it. Branes are not just around and surrounding third dimensional objects. Strings in String Theory are mostly one dimensional particles that are only about10 x -31 meters long and the branes are Two dimensional 'skins' which are wrapped around the strings themselves. This way the math of String Theory can be better solved so the strings would not just fall apart ( they don't need the math we need it to explain what is going on) Without a lot of equationsthis is the best I can do for now. Also, Membranes where the term 'branes' come from can be of higher dimension but one person's body would not have a membrane from another person's body for we would not be able to react normally with each other. A membrane is a way universes are seperated not just physical bodies in one universe. It would take for me a little more schooling to answer better. Brian

2006-07-20 14:05:44 · answer #2 · answered by brian p 1 · 0 0

I don't think you really understand what a brane is. Someone mentioned about the dimentions of strings etc. Particle physics which came before string theory is based on zero dimensional or point particles. Examples of these are electrons, quarks, and photons. String theory expanded on this and said what if these particles aren't point like at all but made from little loops of 'string'? This helped resolve some issues involved physics, but to get a model to work extra dimensions had to be added. These are too small to see or even detect. Generally string theory is formulated in 10 dimensions 3 space, 1 time, and 6 small curled up ones.

M-theory expands further and says why stop at strings? Why not have higher dimensional objects such as branes (2D like membranes) etc. M-theory is in 11-dimensions.

In general a string or brane is v. v. small so a person is made of lots and lots of them. No one has come up with a fully consistent string theory or M-theory yet, although apparently it is promising.

2006-07-20 14:01:41 · answer #3 · answered by Jam 1 · 0 0

The human body of an individual person can not be considered a brane.

2006-07-19 20:51:45 · answer #4 · answered by IT 4 · 0 0

1st of all string theory has such a big flaw i don't know how it got 'popular'
if the basic building block of the universe is a 'string',
and that gets accepted,
somebody is gonna divide the string in half because it is 2 dimensional.
the basic unit of the universe must be basically 1 dimentional.
if there is more than 4 dimensions,
(of course there is)
then
there is an infinite number of them
i don't understand why there would be a finite number

2006-07-19 21:05:26 · answer #5 · answered by dwh 3 · 0 0

I dont have a brane as long as I dont know what brane is. Can you enlighten me about it please?

2006-07-20 00:49:48 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I agree.

2006-07-20 13:04:30 · answer #7 · answered by thewordofgodisjesus 5 · 0 0

i will pass this one to ART BELL

2006-07-19 14:15:46 · answer #8 · answered by skihippy 2 · 0 0

eryrjyh

2006-07-20 13:19:39 · answer #9 · answered by GODDARD 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers