America went on the warpath after 9-11 . The tanks rolled ..........
North Korea claims that the only reason it's government is still there is a large military and nuclear weapons ....they appear to be right. According to Dan Rather they see Iraq's mistake as not having the bomb.
Does the US only take on small countries it knows it can beat?
What is it about N Korea or what does it have etc that makes Americans think twice and suddenly send diplomats????
2006-07-06 13:57:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
North Korea doesn't have any oil.
2006-07-06 14:00:50 · answer #1 · answered by Duffman 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Make up your little minds. You can't have it both ways. We didn't give diplomacy enough time to work in Iraq but now we're supposed to nuke North Korea the day after they test fire some useless missiles. Little Kimmie will get his in time.
And which useless European country are you from? I'm sure at some point MY country has saved it's ***. A thank you would be nice!
2006-07-06 21:11:18 · answer #2 · answered by Nuke Lefties 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
North Korea has working nuclear weapons, courtesy of Pres. Clinton.
2006-07-06 21:10:21 · answer #3 · answered by rb42redsuns 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because Saddam was harboring Al Qaeda terrorists and WMDs it was supposed to get rid of back in the 1980s.
Right now, Bush has SUCCESSFULLY isolated North Korea!
2006-07-06 21:17:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes! The United States Government is thinking twice because they cannot strong arm Kim Jong Il. He is giving the US. Government the Na-Na... Come and get me! By launching those rockets...Look what I got! When it comes to politics it feels like you are on the playground again... I think George W. Bush is a bully. I can't blame N. Korea for arming themselves... (I don't think they are right for what they are doing) BUT when you see everyone around you getting their asses kicked wouldn' t you want to protect yourself? I say we have one hell of a fireworks display and get rid of everyone.
2006-07-06 21:11:18 · answer #5 · answered by bklyngirl 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
because George senior did not go into North Korea and fail at getting Kim Jong Il like he did Sadam
2006-07-06 20:59:42 · answer #6 · answered by crippler5511 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
North Korea has a much larger army and China covering its ***.
2006-07-06 21:01:37 · answer #7 · answered by PARKERD 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
noth korea has military backing with china, so a war with nkorea would meen war with china, iraq had no freinds other than terrorists, thats why. plus korea actually has a formidable military.
2006-07-06 21:00:59 · answer #8 · answered by Hellion 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LMAO @ using Dan Rather as a source. As if he has even a tiny little fragment of credibility left. Who wrote this question, Mary Mapes? rofl
2006-07-06 21:13:57 · answer #9 · answered by Chris S 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's pretty much all about China. I wonder how this conflict would play out if there were no wars in Iraq and Afghanistan
2006-07-06 21:06:20 · answer #10 · answered by chetahbill 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋