The legislative branch and the judicial branch can share the executive branch's responsibilites, and a senstor can be elected form time to time to do speeches and public realitions.
2006-07-06 13:55:15 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Government
i think its ok the way it is
2006-07-06 13:58:13 · answer #1 · answered by quikboy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Um.... first of all this is the most ridiculous idea I've ever heard. It is obvious that you have no idea the number of the executive branch's responsibilities. And there's a REASON for three branches... each balances the other so that nether can become too powerful. With only two branches it becomes remarkably easier for one to overpower the other.
And also-- you have to remember that there's more to the executive branch than the president and the cabinet. The executive branch goes down from Bush to your town hall meetings... even to things like the FBI...hell--the army! Have fun getting that idea accepted.
2006-07-06 21:36:45 · answer #2 · answered by ImagoDei 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Try reading Political Law books. Read the Constitution.
You will appreciate the importance of the Executive Department.
2006-07-06 20:58:37 · answer #3 · answered by nina 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bravo!!! If George Washington were alive today,I believe he would go into Washington D.C. and CLEAN house!!! Kick off in all the senators and house members tails !!! Then lead a march to the White House,and stomp old Bushy out like a roach!
2006-07-06 21:01:18 · answer #4 · answered by michaelmoss30054 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Bad idea. Checks and balances. The question should be where are the checks on the federal judicial branch. Once federal judges are in they can pretty much do as they please, and "write" legislation as they please by overruling it as matter of political opinion, instead of what they should do, which is interpret current legislation.
2006-07-06 22:28:10 · answer #5 · answered by robling_dwrdesign 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm gonna stick with the US Constitution on this one.
It's got us this far. We've saved the world several times and I'm afraid to go messing with it.
I don't like everything about it.........but as we vote it evolves into pretty much what we need.
So far so good.
2006-07-06 21:03:14 · answer #6 · answered by TeaSwami 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we should fire the whole bunch of them & install a human resources department to hire & fire based on ability & performance like the rest of us . we can hire someone to give the speeches!
2006-07-06 21:21:16 · answer #7 · answered by James C 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
and thus eliminating the designed checks and balances, and opening the people to someone like Saddam
2006-07-06 20:58:58 · answer #8 · answered by Shy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
um, NOT IN YOUR LIFE!!! (and hopefully not afterward...)
2006-07-06 22:52:36 · answer #9 · answered by marimbaman 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋