se...interesting...very interesting. YES!! at running...
2006-07-20 05:45:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by MORENITA 4
·
0⤊
6⤋
I can't think of a worse president for this country than Hillary Clinton. As a woman, it makes me SICK when I hear people talk about how great for women's issues Hillary is.
Really?
She allows her man to dog her publically; flaunt his affairs in front of her with no remorse and no shame. She effectively teaches her child that it's okay for a man to treat a woman as if she's nothing as long as you get some benefit from it in the end, like a seat in the Senate.
I would have had more respect for her if she had cracked him over the head with a ten pound skillet and walked out the door with that little girl in hand. She could have come back in a month or so stating, "For the good of the country, etc.," but she should have at least had the stones to teach her daughter about self respect. If she doesn't have the stones to take her husband to task, how is she going to have the stones to take another country to task?
It takes a village to raise a child, does it? Everything sounds like a good idea until you think it through to its natural conclusion. Do you really want your neighbor telling you how to raise your child? Do you really believe that your atheist neighbor should have the right to call the authorities because you are violating your child's civil rights by choosing to raise your child as a Catholic or a Mormon or Jewish?
These are her thoughts. She published them.
2006-07-20 08:10:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rebecca 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if she has a chance of winning. I do know that she would make a great President. For eight years this country was a lot better than the past six. And Ladies you know better than I do that the only reason Clinton's years' in the White House was so great was because Hillary ran the show. Where would our husbands be if they didn't have us.
2006-07-20 07:55:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Celeste P 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sure she does! And is scares the heck out of Repuglicans!
They know she can and will win if she's nominated. Her husband won TWICE, hands down, with no problem. The country's voters knew they got two for the price of one, and they were fine with that.
They'll get the same deal again if they elect her, and they'd simply love to get good ol' Bill back in the White House.
AND, at last we'd have a president who's smarter than us - again.
Her strategery will not be misunderestimated. (Sorry! Couldn't help myself!)
She's a giant in politics. AND she's loved by women everywhere because she DID stand by her man, even though the extreme right wingers (remember those godly, righteous, moral, upstanding, holier than God Republicans who believed that family is the most important thing in the world????) screamed for her to leave him high and dry and divorce his skanky butt.
She didn't. She held her head high and realized that, even if they'd just been plain old Hill and Bill from Podunk, Ark., he might very well have cheated on her at his mid-life crisis, if some voluptuous young woman had thrown herself at him time after time.
And then there were the hilarious (if not tragic) falling from grace outings of all those Republicans who had screamed so loud about morals, only to have THEIR nasty little peccadillos revealed.
Revenge is sweet.
And yes, Hillary can and WILL win.
Oh, and by the way - she is NOT a liberal. I am, and I can tell you, she and Bill are moderates, not liberals.
Chew on that!
2006-07-20 02:22:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by dragonheart 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Partisanship makes her a divisive love-her or hate-her person. No one is supporting her because of her stand on the issues or philosophy. Still she is dangerous because
1. She has the largest war chest of any candidate.
2. The three Republicans with the best chance to beat her (McCain, Giuliani and Romney) don't have a prayer of getting the nomination.
3. No Democratic contender will directly say a negative thing about her or her husband.
4. If an anti war candidate does well in New Hampshire, she will morph her position. (Ala RFK vs Eugene McCarthy).
5. There will be 5 underfunded men in the primaries. There is no alternative woman that will split the feminists.
2006-07-14 20:42:30
·
answer #5
·
answered by Woody 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe that she will have a chance on 2008, because she has a strong will determination that you can see in her, I, as a female think that it is time that the opposite sex had a go on being the next president of the United States of America. Why? because we see that a lot of the presidents that have taken office can not do a better job then a woman can. Just remember that behind a man there is a woman stronger that him giving moral support to him.
2006-07-20 12:53:46
·
answer #6
·
answered by a.vasquez7413@sbcglobal.net 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
A snow balls chance in hell!! I have to believe that the American public has more sense that to put the controlled of this train in her hands. She can't even run her own family much less the most powerful country in the world. This is the same Hillary Rotten that was going to fix health care right after Babba became president. Within 90 days she walked away from the project leaving millions screaming for help. They are still screaming for help.
2006-07-18 01:02:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by The Mick "7" 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you think America is so hard-up for candidates that we will select her?
While a woman should be given consideration for the position, there are at least 125-million American women who would make a better President, including some of those who strum guitars and scream into microphones.
Unfortunately, she is a senator from New York, a state that has no idea what's going on in the world ( they proved that when she was elected their senator),..and they may make the same mistake again.
2006-07-18 03:58:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Mr.Been there 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes I like Gore , Clinton in 2008.
2006-07-19 14:46:56
·
answer #9
·
answered by willberb 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am independent, but liberal in most of my beliefs. I am pulling for the Democrats, but I'm not really pulling for Hillary, I think she's a little too left for a real chance. My candidate, I dunno if he's even running, pretty sure though, is John McCain, a guy that has actually experienced war firsthand and would do whatever he could with diplomacy and use war as the absolute last measure, not the first. Playtime cowboys like Bush go looking for war, but a former POW uses his military like a lifeboat, you hate to have to use it, but it's your only choice.
2006-07-19 23:40:30
·
answer #10
·
answered by nukecat25 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, there are so many writhing and spitting conservatives, she would never get past them in a million years. I think there are internet groups started years ago called Stophillary.com, or something similar. Conservatives hate her so vehemently, if necessary they will glue her head onto a picture of a naked woman in pornography or worse to discredit her, if I were her I wouldn't let the Dems talk me into running. They will try to humiliate her
My point is proven another question right now on YahooAnswers "Is Hilary Clinton, Satan's daughter?"
2006-07-06 13:19:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by magpie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋