Again, Bush just can't get it right...??

Question

I don't know about you, but I am fed up with the hypocracy in the world today! There are people, who criticize Bush for the war in Iraq, but yet they are pissed off that he hasn't declared war on NK! WTF??? What?? Saddam wasn't evil enough?? Did he not threaten not only his people but the rest of the world as well?? If there is anyone to blame for the diplomacy and hesitation to respond to the NK situation, its all the critics of GWB! Aren't you proud now!!

Answer 1

Well the left leaning whine-bags don't have too long to whine and boo-hoo about George W. Bush for long. I don't believe Condi is running in 2008 so I believe we'll get some moron like Kerry or Gore, or someone who thinks with his groin like Bill Clinton, or some totally imcompetent fool like Carter or a power mad megalomaniac like Hillary Clinton. Then by 2012 the nation will be splitting apart, if not going into outright civil war, our national infrastructure would have been repeatedly attacked and torn apart by terrorist and especially if we get Hillary Clinton our civil and personal liberties would be nearly non-existent. Remember travelgate, filegate, Vince Foster?

So the liberals can whine, boo-hoo, sling mud and bash GWB all they want to. Fact is George W. Bush has had the toughest six years in office since FDR, and he's worked hard and done his best. I don't agree with all his policies and decisions but he has stood by his principles and has tried to do what was best for America - not sticking his wet finger in the air trying to win a popularity contest or appease the wimpy Europeans.

Answer 2

Don't listen to those crazy liberals. They're just jealous. If Kerry would have been president, we would be WAY worse off. The USA might be a giant crater. It's funny how liberals HATE it when someone actually tackles the problems, instead of ignoring them so they get too big and we have to send thousands of troops into other countries. If Clinton had done what he was supposed to do during his term, Saddam would have been behind bars for a long time now and Bush wouldn't have sent troops to Iraq. Same with Osama. But Clinton was too busy using power, not for saving a beaten down nation, but seducing young interns. Great President huh? The fact is liberals will never make up their minds about what they want, they always want to go against whatever GWB does good or bad. It's sad!

PS. Read Godless by Ann Coulter to get a taste of what liberalism really is!

Answer 3

No, in my opinion, the possible reason Bush isn't rushing into war with North Korea is because 1) other countries actually know something's going on and realize how dangerous it could be or 2) maybe he realized that the way he rushed into Iraq, with no major world powers except Great Britain in the "coalition of the willing" was wrong and he doesn't want to make the same mistake twice. I do think it is pretty ironic how there was really no concrete evidence about WMDs in Iraq and how we still haven't actually found the smoking gun there, but we know that North Korea is doing potentially harmful acts and we sit by not doing anything, it seems (in comparison to the invasion in Iraq). I'm glad we're not; I'm all for diplomacy. You speak of "blaming diplomacy." Who's blaming diplomacy? Since when did dipIomacy become such a negative in this country? I don't understand why that idea wasn't used more before we invaded Iraq. We should've gotten more powers on our side before we rushed into the country. Yes, Saddam was evil, the whole world knew that, but there were more options we could've used before an invasion we were not ready for. I'm not saying our soldiers weren't prepared (I am in full support of the troops), but our government had no idea of the scale of the insurgency. And by the way, I'm a liberal and I definitely think it is wrong for us to go unilaterally into North Korea, so those who think all liberals want that can quit being so stereotypical.

Answer 4

Are you even smart approximately themes? I recommend via fact that Obama took over, themes are transforming into gradually worse than any of the mess left by employing skill of Bush. it is black and white and the information and figures are there. I understand which you will consistently hate Bush and nonetheless will to no longer blame him for each little difficulty yet this President is in value now and he might desire to be held in charge for what he has no longer performed. An abjecxt failure different than you're looking via rose colored glasses.

Answer 5

You know what is even better? Nancy Pelosi is out there leading the Democrats in saying that Bush has to go into N. Korea unilaterally. Now wait a second here, we went into Iraq "alone" and they criticize Bush. But now the liberals want us to go into North Korea "alone"? Does anyone else understand what is going on here?

Answer 6

Happy birthday Bush

Answer 7

Bush has had to deal with more problems than any president in history no one could have done any better in this day and time most of the complainers don't even vote.

Answer 8

its because saddam is like that little bizatch you see at the playground. hes small but he thinks hes way tough. so hes not worth any1s time, but korea is like the big kid at the playground whos just plain crazy! whats a bigger threat? the little bizatch with no muscle or the huge dude on a rampage?

Answer 9

let me give you an example by relating an experience i once had. i walked into a Scientology room sat down and took a personality test. i failed. later i went back remembering my mistakes from the last test. i gave right answers and again failed. apparently, in order to change my personality i had to make an investment. from that time on i have felt that if Jesus Christ walked in and took that same test he would probably fail to. so you see, pleasing people is impossible.

Answer 10

bush can never get anything right...people only wanted him in the white house so they can have something to laugh at on a bad day.