you divided by zero....
when you divide by zero you go to hell
(b-a) = 0 and canceling is same as dividing by
2006-07-06 12:01:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by ic3d2 4
·
4⤊
2⤋
Yes, I'm sure. 1 = 1 and 2 = 2, and 1 â 2.
Here's a recent Best Answer to "I once saw a method of proving tht 2=1 It started a=b therfore ab= a "squared" Does anyone know the rest??"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AsJxNgJXr90XlyQso0qSZT_sy6IX?qid=20060626065831AAYIBJi
You can't cancel (in step 5) because you're dividing both sides by zero, a math no-no.
2006-07-06 12:04:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Louise 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
False
1•0=2•0 (this is line 4) does not mean that 1=2 (line 5), you can not cancel the 0 (or a-b, as you have it written) because 0 has no inverse.
2006-07-06 12:01:57
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eulercrosser 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
In step 4 you are diving by 0 (a-b) so therefore the whole thing goes out the window. Divide anything by 0 and it's undefined, or infinity; in either event, it doesn't prove 1=2. Sorry.
2006-07-06 12:03:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
interesting.
after looking at this, i can see that a problem arises in step 3.
assuming that a = 1 during this step would mean (1x1) - (1^2) which would equal zero. Anything you do to zero will give you zero, for instance, you can multiply one side by a million and the other side by a billion and they will still equal zero.
math is quite fascinating though. =)
2006-07-06 12:04:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Steven B 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Step 4-5 is incorrect. Simplifying a(b-a) = (b+a)(b-a) gives you
ab = b^2, not a = b+a
2006-07-06 12:11:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Xymon 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
when you cancelled (b-a), you divided by 0 (you started with a=b ===> b-a=0 ). This will give you an undefined answer, which makes your proof erroneous.
2006-07-06 17:37:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by early_sol 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Keep at it. Who knows, maybe you will find the solution to the universe some day!
2006-07-06 12:07:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by powhound 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
1 (body) = 2 (two legs)
you are right :))
2006-07-06 12:20:42
·
answer #9
·
answered by !!! Radwan !!! 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, it is true, it just doesn't work very well in this dimention.
2006-07-06 12:24:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Quiet Amusement 4
·
0⤊
0⤋