The site http://www.forbiddenarcheology.com suggests that there are counter-evolution archaeological discoveries being made, and also being covered up by the scientific community. I'm curious to hear what people think of this site, if it's legit or if the data presented here is flawed. Regardless of your view of evolution, it's interesting reading. For instance, according to the site:
"...in 1913 when Professor Hans Reck, of Berlin University, found a human skeleton in the upper part of Bed II at Olduvai Gorge, Tanzania. Modern dating methods give a late Early Pleistocene date of around 1.15 million years for this site. Reck said, "The bed in which the human remains were found....showed no sign of disturbance."
So what does that mean? How could human remains be found at a site dated over a million years old?
2006-07-06 10:56:54 · 3 answers · asked by Rob 5 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Other - Science
I think this one is better
http://www.harunyahya.com/
http://www.harunyahya.com/books/darwinism/living_fossils/fossils_01.php
2006-07-06 12:48:58 · answer #1 · answered by qwertyu 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
go to a website called drdino.com. it will explain everything there has never been a full skeleton found of human remains that long ago everything they find is always bites and pieces.they make up or predict what they might of looked like. Carbon dating doesnt work either.
2006-07-06 22:53:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
There are no common DNA to Humans, and Neanderthal "man." God created man for fellowship with Him.
2006-07-13 14:16:03 · answer #3 · answered by thewordofgodisjesus 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋