You must be a Michael Savage fan. He once had an affair with the beat poet Alan Ginsberg, along with some homosexual affairs with party boys from Fiji. His parents are Russian Jewish immigrants. He never mentions his faith, for fear it might turn away his mostly gentile following. His real name is Michael Weiner, which would make him the Savage Weiner. He wrote a novel which was semi autobiographical in which the main character(Sam Trueblood) wrestled with his desires to have sex with men. He has written books on herbs and has espoused the usuage of marijuana. Of course, now he takes a militant anti drug stance in keeping with his ultra conservative persona. He is the son of immigrants, but spews nothing but hatred for the immigrants crossing the border from Mexico. He says it is because they are illegal, but I think he just xenophobic.He has called real American heroes such as John Murtha and John McCain traitors. Of course, he has never served one day in defense of his country. He is a coward and a fraud. He will say anything his rabid ultra conservative audience wants to hear, and it is all for ratings. Did I mention he is from New York City and not San Francisco? Notice how many Yiddish words and phrases he uses. His political conversion is a result of his being turned down by the UC Berkley jounalism department. He wanted to be the head of the department, but he had little experience. He blamed this on his being a white male. The man is trash.
2006-07-08 09:46:21
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well, the election was fraudulently stolen by the right wing candidate Calderón. The polls clearly show that Obrador was in the lead by FAR, then miraculously overnight all those people changed thier minds? I think not. It is fraud, typical of the right wingers in Mexico and in the US. It will happen here this year and in 2008. Get used to it.
Your second question (since you are such an honest conservative) is utter nonsense. Liberals a cancer? Too stupid to even comment on.
Trouble making anarchists? I guess it would seem that way to people like yourself who can't understand what is going on, you have no political education so I don't blame you. I guess they do make trouble for flag-wavers and other people who just lock-step march like fascists right off the cliff.
Well, stick to the things you know, Ann Coulter books and hair gel.
2006-07-06 10:35:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is a lot of evidence of possible problems in the election. With a result that close things should be closely looked at.
That said, I don't support protests. I do support the most thorough research before a winner is named.
There is a long history of rigged elections in Mexico. You want to make sure that this is accurate and provably so. Otherwise, you risk the legitimacy of Democracy in Mexico.
Doesn't matter which side came out on the losing end, that's what I would suggest.
2006-07-06 10:29:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by WBrian_28 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
There would be protest whether or not he "authorized" it.
As others have said already, you really need to learn about Mexican politics before stating your opinions.
....and no, liberals are not a cancer and trouble-making anarchist, just as conservatives are not greedy money obsessed Nazis who long to do away with the poor by forcing them to be disposable labor-slaves.
2006-07-06 10:38:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by BarronVonUnderbeiht 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
in case you prepare the politics of hatred and branch, it type of feels somewhat hypocritical to anticipate those who're defeated to reply with some thing resembling grace. both between the Bush electoral campaigns (2000 and 2004) were in conserving with hate. So, the socialist candidate in France notes that a good extra intense version of the dislike campaign would bring about violence and also you finish that leftists are detrimental losers. awaken for goodness sake! we are meant to be able to disagree, debate, and nonetheless appreciate one yet another. seem on the Bush administration. Any undertaking to their judgements is greeted with taunts of treason. it really is time for you on the right to face as a lot as this and insist that loose speech and debate be secure.
2016-11-06 00:12:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
All these leftist are throwing stones to a transparent wall
And there was no cheating... the problem is that Lopez Obrador and lots of his followers just loooove doing drama, mess and protests, and they are seen on tv... but most of Mexican people is sick tired of it, we don't want a psycho as a president.
2006-07-06 10:47:31
·
answer #6
·
answered by ma_isa 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just spilled over the boarder.
2006-07-06 10:26:43
·
answer #7
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
hmm now why does that sound familiar?
2006-07-06 10:31:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by ben s 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I can't believe it.
2006-07-10 16:45:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
OOOPs, wrong room...can you tell me how to get to the political science section please?
2006-07-08 14:30:33
·
answer #10
·
answered by The Y!ABut 6
·
0⤊
0⤋