English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There once was a time when feminism fought for the helpless. They faught against the business men who oppressed others in order to succeed in their selfish goals. Now, radical feminists believe killing helpless unborn children for the sake of their education and career is, not only understandable, but logical.

Decades past, feminists once resented the idea of neglectful fathers putting their careers before the needs of their wives and children. They strove to make these neglectful fathers realize how much their wives and children need their support and participation in the house. Now, radical feminists not only support women who put their careers before their children, (and are hardly home), but often encourage so.

Has Radical Feminism forsaken the original goals of Feminism? Have they been overpowered by the "enemy"? Do Radical Feminists live by the saying "If you can't beat them, join them"?

2006-07-06 09:45:54 · 8 answers · asked by man_id_unknown 4 in Social Science Gender Studies

8 answers

Radical feminism is destroying all the major goals women had during the 20s and 30s when we saw the strength of the woman's suffrage movement in full force.

Radical feminism is simply a reversal of roles, but it still limits your choices on what to do with life in the exact same way. Instead of being a homemaker, women are expected to be white-collar workers. But the whole point of the feminist movement wasn't to get women out of the kitchen - merely unchain them from it, give them the choice to go out and do things and live their lives. If that included cooking and cleaning, so be it.

In fact, I'd say radical feminism oversteps the line by making demands on empowering females beyond the point of equality, and that is what severely sabotages their movement. Radical feminists just want a reversal of roles so women are where men were sixty years ago, and are still unsure where the men should fit in (with the exceptance of a sty, since we are all apparently pigs).

2006-07-06 09:53:13 · answer #1 · answered by blairs_smirking_revenge 3 · 10 2

Often people only hear about the radical feminists. And say "oh feminism thats just crazy women wanting to push out men." or whatever the case. That does become a problem when the real goals of feminism is just creating a voice for those who very often don't or didn't have a voice before.

So yes radicals are the worst enemy to the cause.

2006-07-06 09:50:05 · answer #2 · answered by bushbaby_rsa 2 · 0 0

Radical feminism is the enemy of EVERYONE!

How else can you conclude this when the radicals seek to demonize men and disunify men and woman at every turn? Sounds like the work of the devil rather than a political position.

Two things that convinced me that today's feminism is total trash are these events:

1. Feminists REFUSED to condemn O.J. for spousal abuse and murder. The feminists need the Congressional Black Caucus' support for feminist legislation, and they decided that avoiding the principles on which they were founded were more important than rallying against a black man. Politics before principle.

2. Bill Clinton's lengthy track record of abusing women. The feminists gave Clinton a whole stack of get-out-of-jail free cards. Feminists were quick to call the women bimbos and whores rather than giving them support and the benefit of the doubt. Again, politics over principle.

Every movement has its day, but there is an expiration date, and someone needs to inform the feminists that their day is over.

2006-07-06 10:01:48 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The radical fringe, in any movement, does serve a purpose, namely, it makes the moderates seem very reasonable. They also help keep the moderates honest and true to their original cause, as they (the radicals) are almost always the first to cry foul at any perceived slight or sell out. And besides. it would be the antithesis of feminism to deny any woman her voice, merely because it does not represent the majority opinion. That said, I do not agree with radical feminism, as I think it is more about separating women from society than it is about incorporating them into it. However, I'm glad that they are out there on the fringe and readily acknowledge that many of the achievements of feminism were born on the radical fringe, before being nurtured to maturity in the moderate camp.

2006-07-06 09:59:26 · answer #4 · answered by Christina D 5 · 0 0

I like the old fashioned female (housewife). I am all about it.

I think the problem with American Society is that women do not take the time to raise there children properly. When I say properly I don't mean manners but more nutruring there social and emotional development. Just being a mom.

2006-07-06 09:50:32 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

radical islamic fundamentalism is the enemy of feminism. I wish we could arm NOW and send them over to Iraq and recall the troops. radical feminists against radical islamists?? wouldn't you pay an arm and a leg for that dvd????-:)

Vin

2006-07-06 10:26:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

First i visit assume that you stay in us of a, like me. I believe you that radical feminists provide a nasty popularity to feminism. in accordance to wikipedia, feminism is "a determination of moves geared in the direction of defining, organising, and protecting equivalent political, economic, and social rights and equivalent possibilities for females" . even if, radical feminists are nonetheless call feminists and that is enforced by using different females, themselves and the media. you even might want to for sure the reason why females are so many times judged on their actual visual charm is with the aid of females. females decide different females on their actual visual charm more advantageous than adult males do. As a guy i visit allow you to do not ignore that see you later as a females is sparkling, in nice condition and has a strong personality... i'd easily provide her a hazard. yet females who're born with each and each and every of the coolest seems want to earnings of it and they save the cycle going (maximum). So even as females like the before defined want equivalent rights... they don't desire equivalent rights. they need the benefits of what they have now alongside with equivalent rights. you want equivalent rights then do not assume the guy to pay for a date, do not assume him to continually open the door or pay on your stuff once you're courting.... that's going to be a stability. very last yet not least, feminism is misused by using females themselves. My sister, 18, stated that i turned right into a woman hater and that the feminists women like her doesn't enable adult males like me to get on with their procedures. This become when I, 22, complained to my mom on why she did not might want to artwork to purchase her own stuff(for the time of summer season). I had to artwork complete time for the time of HS to help my mom help us. My mom's reaction: "she is a woman". i like them both very a lot yet stuff like that is unacceptable. so see you later as you want extra reward on excellent of equality, you'll continually get an same reaction: GTFO. i'm all about equality yet i'm not in any respect going at hand my balls to a all of us.

2016-10-14 04:47:04 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

anything radical is an enemy to the cause it is trying to help

2006-07-06 09:47:40 · answer #8 · answered by tabdo1 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers