I know Italy should'nt have gotten that faul agnst australia , But they also shouldnt of gotten that red card . so if the ref hadnt messed up twice who knows who would of wined !
2006-07-06 09:28:54 · 6 answers · asked by cingular11111 2 in Sports ➔ Football ➔ FIFA World Cup (TM)
Yea France should of never got'en that penalty kick over Portugal.
2006-07-06 09:56:03 · update #1
I agree with you. But I think that if that game hadn't been messed up by the referee, Italy would still have won. If they could beat Germany 2-0 without any help by the referee, they could have won over Australia too. The Socceroos did well for a team being on their first World Cup, but Germany were a much stronger team than them.
2006-07-06 09:47:02 · answer #1 · answered by thecatphotographer 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
England and USA, not because of a bad call but they just stink and shouldn't have qualified for the World Cup at all.
It's funny how people think that the penalty kick awarded to Italy was unfair but the one awarded to France against Portugal was justified? All you Italy haters need to get a life.
2006-07-06 16:42:23 · answer #2 · answered by Forza Azzurri! 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Switzerland. Just like in the qualifiers Swiss based FIFA, Swiss Sepp Blatter did everything they can to ensure them the second round. France had scored a goal against them, Korea game Korea got cheated. That is 4 extra points.
On the Italy situation I agree with you.
the Brits should not whine as it was justified.
2006-07-06 16:32:05 · answer #3 · answered by PANCHO 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
England was all hype and should not have made it that far. As usual, the creme stays on top.
2006-07-06 16:32:43 · answer #4 · answered by joseph p 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
France has been given call after call in their favor.
2006-07-06 16:33:14 · answer #5 · answered by cosnowboarder777 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
italy, italy and italy
2006-07-06 16:33:15 · answer #6 · answered by Bobby Charlton...my hero! 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋