English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

They got rid of tyson chandler for a reason. they made room for big ben. Can he bring the bulls back to the golden age? Was it the right choice of getting big ben?

2006-07-06 09:20:58 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Basketball

25 answers

no the bulls need mj to get to the golden ages ben had a role with a team he will go to the bulls undersized and aging and will never fit into the system and will retire a rich man and the bulls will go from baby bulls to baby knicks because they will continue to overpay players

2006-07-06 09:22:58 · answer #1 · answered by Detroit fan stuck in California 5 · 0 2

Of course it was the best reason to bring Big Ben and get rid of Tyson Chandler because he will bring more excitement to the United Center. Besides Ben Wallace is a better defensive player and that will make a big difference

2006-07-06 09:30:13 · answer #2 · answered by Sisko_Kid 2 · 0 0

He will make a big defensive impact and probably impart some words of wisdom..being a veteran. However, I think Big Ben has at best two good years left. He is slowing down a bit and his free throw shooting and offense were never to be desired. He isn't really the go-to guy the Bulls need.

2006-07-06 09:36:29 · answer #3 · answered by Mav17 5 · 0 0

ben wallace is a great player, an excellent defender, and was part of an absolutely phenomenal team. but that's the thing. he was only good with the TEAM. i mean the pistons are great when they have chauncey, hamilton, rasheed, and ben on the court. take a look at the all-star game. perfect example. the east won because of those four players' excellent teamwork. but ben wallace cannot do it all for the bulls. he needs his team. and frankly, without those guys, he's nothing but a center who's probably not even better than eric dampier.

2006-07-06 09:47:28 · answer #4 · answered by Lesley 2 · 0 0

even though im a Miami Heat fan, I think Ben Wallace will make a huge impact for the Bulls. I think they may work on his offense a little bit more so he won't be just a defender but can give them about 7-10 pts/gm

2006-07-06 09:35:47 · answer #5 · answered by XFACTOR33 1 · 0 0

It's good that the Bulls got him. But Ben wont be scoring...he will be a great defensive presence for them, and a great big guy who can rebound, which is what they wanted. I'm sure they are very very satisfied with there addition.

2006-07-06 11:02:07 · answer #6 · answered by ryguy2303 3 · 0 0

man do you guys not know about hoops or what? whoever said that he will not make an impact is an idiot..

chicago was already a solid team.. and now they have that center position filled up.. watch out! what do you think made the pistons so great?

the league is in a drought of good centers.. and now the bulls have one of the best defensive wise

along w/ gordon, hinrich, nocioni, and company.. that's going to be a team to wreckon with

2006-07-06 09:36:59 · answer #7 · answered by do it movin' 1 · 0 0

The Bulls were not that bad last year. This year maybe even better. Think about this, they were the only team that gave the Miami Heat trouble during the playoffs.

2006-07-06 09:24:19 · answer #8 · answered by Sara A 2 · 0 0

Definitely, he will make a huge impact on the defensive end for the bulls and he will help them win more games.

2006-07-06 11:13:29 · answer #9 · answered by mike 3 · 0 0

I think it makes the Bulls a contender....no doubt about it..I wouldnt think it makes them the dominant team but definitely a contender and perhaps even a favorite in the Eastern Conference. There are still 3 Western Conference teams that are title contenders...

2006-07-06 09:26:11 · answer #10 · answered by djmantx 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers