we know mass and energy are interconvertable, but my question is that when there is energy and we calculate its mass equivelent, are we just finding the convertion rate between the two or does the actual energy have a gravitational pull?
2006-07-06 09:05:03 · 9 answers · asked by kevin h 3 in Science & Mathematics ➔ Physics
it's just the conversion rate, energy isn't mass and therefore has no gravitational pull.
2006-07-06 09:08:05 · answer #1 · answered by The Frontrunner 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
i'd say no, means and mass are 2 reduce and dried multiple issues.certain you'll get means out of a few mass which contain Fuels.. yet all kinds of mass gained't produce means. I actually have a block of timber, i am going to burn it, and it is going to produce means. I actually have a block of metal, except i am going to damage down the atomic structure, i am going to't get means out of it. Many have reported the speed of light is a boundary. merely as changed into reported about the speed of sound. i remember on the destiny in the close to destiny there'll be a damage by using in the speed of light, and we are able to make certain such issues as not in any respect beforehand. I continually say dream and dream vast, attain for the Universe. we haven't any limits except those we position on ourselves.
2016-11-01 08:03:16 · answer #2 · answered by sikorski 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It's both!
You're finding the conversion factor, **and** energy exerts a gravitational pull.
Ever hear about the bending of light near massive objects? It was one of the early successes of Einstein's relativity theory.
2006-07-06 15:07:27 · answer #3 · answered by genericman1998 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you could calculate the gravitational pull once you find the amount of mass the energy would create.
2006-07-06 10:54:42 · answer #4 · answered by Reuben Y 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
convertion rate, gravitional pull would be exerting energy, which would be energy loss, nothing to do with it's mass.
2006-07-06 09:10:50 · answer #5 · answered by DarkWolf_1st 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
convertion
2006-07-06 09:12:33 · answer #6 · answered by seeker 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are finding just the conversion!
2006-07-06 09:10:49 · answer #7 · answered by jjnsao 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You had me at "hello."
2006-07-06 09:07:14 · answer #8 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no it woulden't have gravity
2006-07-06 09:15:35 · answer #9 · answered by mickeymom2boyz 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋