I mean when Harry Potter is over could he get other roles. I mean he is so identified with that one character I doubt he could play another without people thinking of Potter. My opinion how bout yours please be civil ok
2006-07-06 08:34:30 · 7 answers · asked by gerbil31603 5 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Radcliffe is no Harrison Ford or Pierce Brosnon I have to say. A lot of child actors flop after they hit 21 ie Danny Bonaduce,MaCully Culkin and Dana Plato
2006-07-06 08:44:37 · update #1
I have to say when harry potter is over so is he !! People will always think of his as Harry .
2006-07-06 16:47:24 · answer #1 · answered by Robin 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
When Dan was young, he was VERY cute. I watch Harry Potter because I like watching him. But as he grows older, he becomes less and less attractive. I do not watch Harry Potter because I like his acting. He is way too tense. If you pay extra extra attention, you could see his veins showing on his neck and hands. When he acts, he becomes pretty stiff. Sad, but that's the truth! But then I don't think he would care. With Harry Potter, he can live a GOOD life until the day he dies, as long as he does not spend his money like drinking water.
2006-07-06 15:58:12 · answer #2 · answered by Mercii 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have thought that it'd be difficult to get over his Harry Potter image... thus, it'd be tough for him to be great in any other role. But, we have yet to see him in other roles, so I guess it's best to wait. I just hope people will be able to sort of move on while watching him in an another movie role, or else they wouldn't enjoy the actual movie as much, probably!
2006-07-06 15:40:49 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
ABSOLUTELY! More than absolutely, MOST DEFINITIVELY!! They're breeding him to become a fit actor for the series' ending, but afterwards, you'll only see him in films like "Hustlers Vol.69" and "The Fukme Hotel"
His personality, ambiguous sexual orientation and one-dimensional acting is only compatible with the Harry Potter series.
The characteristics by themselves are compatible with other things, like Hale Berry has kind of a weak personality but she's perfect, and Elijah Wood is sexually ambiguous but he could be in more than one film, and Naomi Watts is one-dimensional and gets away with it.
But when you put it all together... you get Daniel Radcliff. =(
2006-07-07 13:42:34 · answer #4 · answered by its just me!! 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
At first, I would have agreed with you. He would have been typecast for the rest of his life (see Mark Hammil) But now, I'm not sure anymore. He really has grown from the first movie to now and I could genuinely see him growing out of it. Give it a few more years, and he may develop into a good enough actor to escape from it.
2006-07-06 15:39:00 · answer #5 · answered by Ian M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I tend to agree wth you. I think that among all " Harry Potter" kids only that girl Emma might be a succesfull actress someday.
2006-07-06 15:39:06 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes.Emma Watson and Dan will probaly be really famous one day.As for Rupert Grint well.....
2006-07-06 15:40:30 · answer #7 · answered by abercrombie_lover101 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋