Overtime yes. Due to the fact that we need to become a bigger trading block. As Glenn Beck says were are heading for Mexamericanada.
2006-07-06 08:36:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
If you're asking where the geographic center would be, it's Rugby, North Dakota. The economic and political centers of a trans-continental union would be unlikely to change from those of today for many reasons (note that Bonn, Germany still has a political atmosphere 20 years after reunification). This is, of course, all under the very improbable assumption that such a union would be formed as anything significantly more than what NAFTA already is.
2016-03-27 06:45:15
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
We will not become one North American country, because each separate nation (America, Canada, and Mexico) still has its own problems trying to resolve the continued issue of strong central government versus state/commonwealth/territorial control. I believe the initiative of the NAFTA superhighway is ultimately being designed and will be built as part of America's continued efforts to secure the North American continent from a hostile military takeover or annihilation by foreign powers on another continent (i.e. China and N. Korea). It is simply a more extravagant and diplomatic addition to the Eisenhower highway system that was built in the twentieth century to guarantee the success of our military in case of attack by the Soviets. Another example of highways like these being primarily strategic military projects, is the construction of the Audubon in Germany during the Third Reich era. In addition to their military significance, they also provide a boost in the economy by providing a huge public works project to be planned, developed, constructed, and maintained, by not only government employees, but contracted civilian employees. And obviously having a more accessible freeway eases ground transportation routes (this will increase the efficiency of commercial shipping and ease personal travel to a certain degree depending on where you live).
2006-07-06 08:54:46
·
answer #3
·
answered by gee_dunk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I was in 9th grade in 1968 and made this case in debate class bottom line between the natural resources and technology of these three countries it will happen, I thought, incorrectly that Quebec would separate starting a domino that would have eastern Canada in the US about 12 years ago hasn't happen but believe it will.
2006-07-06 08:52:58
·
answer #4
·
answered by Thomas E 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't think that'll happen even though with the way illegal immigration from mexico is now, it's already like the US and mexico is one big country. Just without canada.
At first glance you could mistake mexico for the the 51st state. The big forgotton one that nobody likes.
2006-07-06 09:12:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Only things will keep Americans from supporting such a change:
1. Anti-hispanic sentiment that has been aroused by the immigration debated.
2. The potential confusion that will arise as "bacon" and "canadian bacon" are integrated into the same country.
2006-07-06 08:39:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by Walter 5
·
3⤊
0⤋
That would ONLY benefit Canada and Mexico. We are watching a degradation of a nation (USA), but no way USA will be pulled down to the level of Canada...and Mexico. NEVER.. GOD BLESS AMERICA!
2006-07-06 08:38:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Marlin Darlin 4
·
0⤊
2⤋
Not a chance. The US tried to invade Canada before. We whupped their butts and burned the White House to the ground, and pissed on the ashes!
2006-07-06 11:21:39
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Dear god, I hope not...this is another ploy to get america to wipe mexico's ***...I'm against it...
2006-07-06 08:35:52
·
answer #9
·
answered by gokart121 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That would be interesting....but knowing USA folks...they would complain for dumb reasons....racial....culture....the USA seems to hate anybody not from USA.
2006-07-06 08:36:47
·
answer #10
·
answered by evildunsparce@verizon.net 1
·
2⤊
0⤋