2006-07-06 08:14:48 · 9 answers · asked by Professor Chaos386 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
Lest we forget the Micheal Jackson...
and the quick answer to your question is...
peanut butter.
2006-07-06 08:18:01 · answer #1 · answered by Drizzle 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
They're all guilty, but I don't think it was a matter of the defense. The prosecutor in both the Blake and OJ case screwed up. The prosecutor in the Peterson case got the job done.
2006-07-06 15:24:30 · answer #2 · answered by Luann 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He was as rich & that did not help. Murdering a very pregnant woman is hard to get away with. If OJ had murdered a pregnant wife, the glove would have fit.
2006-07-06 15:24:44 · answer #3 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If Peterson had more $$$, he would have had a better chance at acquittal. The criminal justice system runs on $$$, not necessarily on fame (although $$$ is often a by-product of fame)
2006-07-06 15:19:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scott Peterson got away with it...He's still breathing isn't he?
2006-07-06 15:19:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Scott Peterson was guilty that's it.....why bother comparing him its a waste of energy...
2006-07-06 15:19:13 · answer #6 · answered by Cassie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Probably not. He had too much evidence against him, between the fights beforehand, the affair with "the other woman," and finding his wife's body in the very area where he admitted he'd been earlier.
2006-07-06 15:19:39 · answer #7 · answered by cross-stitch kelly 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yup. Also listen the song Notorious by Duran Duran. You might like it with this question.
2006-07-06 15:25:59 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
oj got away with his thing cause he had the best lawyers possible
2006-07-06 15:17:59 · answer #9 · answered by gomorgango 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋