thankfully he cant!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-07-06 08:03:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by JCCCMA 3
·
2⤊
3⤋
Well first of all, I am an American citizen living abroad, and because of GW I often don't like to tell people that I am an American. So no, I would like a president that I am not ashamed of. Now as for him running again, the law says he cannot, but I think that during WWII FDR went three terms, the law might have been made since then to keep that from happening. The law isn't really something that the Bush administration is too concerned about anyway.
2006-07-06 08:12:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by MFSD 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
He cant only 2 times or 8 years
2006-07-06 08:03:03
·
answer #3
·
answered by wes1965tindle 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Sarah George Bush can't run again. We don't allow people to run for a 3rd term and no I don't want to change that law; but I do support George Bush as our president and disagree with the left wing fanatics around here that he's done a bad job.
2006-07-06 08:02:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by netjr 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
What grade are you in? I want someone else to run, since that is the LAW. Bush has been a good prez given the circumstances...it's easy to criticize when you don't understand the situation, hence the 3rd term question. do you know that Bush sent troops to Iraq for 2 major reasons 1. to kill terrorists, since that's where most of them lived and 2. to keep war, more terrorist attacks/war OFF of American soil. He's not as bad as you think when you open your mind...your a** will follow.
2006-07-06 08:13:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Marlin Darlin 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't even want to see him finish his second term. I hope he gets impeached after the midterm elections.
A lot of people seem to have forgotten the principles on which this country was founded, and Bush is one of the worst offenders. He likes to talk about "freedom" as if the Republicans have a patent on the word, but he and his administration have deprived us of some our most important constitutional rights and freedoms and want to deprive us of more. Freedom of religion, freedom of speech, freedom of the press, freedom from unlawful search and seizure, freedom from torture, and the right to a fair and speedy trial are all becoming casualties to the Republican agenda, and they're still not satisfied. I wouldn't put it past him to try to amend the Constitution so he can run again (his fellow conservatives have amended it for less), but he must not be allowed to do it.
2006-07-06 08:08:42
·
answer #6
·
answered by ConcernedCitizen 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Well considering he can't run, thanksbetogodforsmallmercies, we won't have to worry about that ... now just let's keep Jeb from running too ... in fact I think there should be a law preventing anybody by the surname Bush to ever run for any office ... daddy Bush and little Bush have both done enough to damage this country and its reputation ....
2006-07-06 08:06:09
·
answer #7
·
answered by Sashie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
For a long time, I thought that USA, was better for having GWB President. I have recently revamped My views as far as he goes. He has done so many things that has caused such destruction and death it's not funny.
I wouldn't want him back in office if he could be back in office. Since his ...reign so to speak...There has been too much bloodshed...from stupid stuff. The man cant even make up his own mind with out someone telling him what to do. I would be surprised to hear if he even knows how to go to the bathroom by himself, yet he is Our leader.......*shakes head*
2006-07-06 08:10:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by Enigma 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Many of the Bush critics say Bush wasn't really elected in 2000 or 2004.
I say ok, if that's the case, then Bush can run for President again. There's nothing stopping him.
2006-07-06 08:07:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hello? You mean to tell me that you honestly dont know Bush cannot run again? Please go back to school and study harder. Stay awake in class. Only 2 terms are allowed for the President. Bush and Clinton cannot be President again. Got it?
2006-07-06 09:06:13
·
answer #10
·
answered by jack f 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, no. He's too liberal, too big-government for my tastes. I'd like to see a good conservative candidate replacing him.
I voted for him, but never thought he was a great candidate. It's just that compared to his competition, he was far and away the best.
Let's face the truth, McCain, Gore and Kerry were not and are not worthy of the office. Good Lord! To think that AlDork was almost president makes me ill.
2006-07-06 08:19:00
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋