2006-07-06 07:28:39 · 24 answers · asked by stormyblythe 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Any person that considers declaring English as racism- I would never vote for them- man or woman. What color is English?She is too caight up in declaring everything as racism- if we keep doing that, are we not keeping racism in America?? The dems need to ease up on using the race card. U'll see- they seem that they are all for blacks now- thats b/c the blacks play into that game of "u wont make it cuz ur black, vote for us, and we'll give u welfare" As soon as Hispanics become a bigger voting block, the dems will be all over them, and blacks? Where will we be?? Stop voting for dems- they give us milk, they dont teach us how to milk the cow- WHY??? cuz we keep coming back, we need that milk and we dont know how to get it ourselves.
2006-07-06 07:57:37 · answer #1 · answered by Voice of reason 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I'm all for a woman President, but I'd vote for Hillary Duff before I voted for Hillary Clinton.
2006-07-06 07:33:13 · answer #2 · answered by blewz4u 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Never! She has little leadership skills other being a b*tch. The time will come when a qualfied woman will become President of the United States, but Hilary's not qualified.
If we could find a female candidate just like the "President" Geena Davis plays on "Commander-In-Chief", I'd vote for her ina heartbeat. She follows no party line - she thinks for herself and does what's best for the country. But, unlike the sleazy reality of actual politics, there's not a snowball's chance in Hell that we could find any candidate like that, male, female, black, white, lesbian, or atheist. -RKO-
2006-07-06 07:49:34 · answer #3 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hillary's already had her 8 years in office. We all know that she was really the president, not Bill.
2006-07-06 07:33:43 · answer #4 · answered by scottish_mom 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Depends on whom ran against her, but I certainly wouldn't be against it. I am kind of tired of the political posturing though, and if the republicrats stay in power in congress, then she won't be able to get anything done, especially being a woman.
Celebsmom:
Yes, eight years of prosperity and peace sucked didn't it? I much prefer the eight years of war, anti-American sentiment and deficit that Bush has given us.
2006-07-06 07:36:27 · answer #5 · answered by Jason H 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would definitely vote for her because a woman should have been in white house by now. And anyone who answers this question like a sexist is an idiot.
2006-07-06 07:33:48 · answer #6 · answered by L-Rad 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not as long as I am in my right mind. Eight years of one Clinton was more than enough.
2006-07-06 07:31:35 · answer #7 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
She's a smart Democrat and she's articulate unlike the baboon who's in office now.
Republicans are so busy putting food on their families.
2006-07-06 07:31:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'd vote for her to be put in prison for inciting hatred of males.
2006-07-06 07:33:51 · answer #9 · answered by smile4763 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would if she were the lesser of the two evils, it could mean progress.
We need a libertarian president.
2006-07-06 07:33:14 · answer #10 · answered by cricket 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋