Bush wants diplomacy with North Korea?

Question

Of course he does. First of all, North Korea has no oil, which means no reason to invade from a U.S. perspective. Second, North Korea poses an ACTUAL THREAT. Bush would never attack anyone that could actually counterattack. Also, attacking North Korea more than likely means that China would get involved. Major U.S. corporations depend too much on Chinese diplomacy (Wal Mart, anyone?) to risk that. On the one hand, that's good for Americans from a selfish perspective, because we don't have to worry about the threat of a nuclear counterattack. On the other hand, it just goes to show how America is run like a monopolistic corporation and thrives on overpowering the weak.

Oh, what a surprise. Someone disagrees with me.

Typical. Assume I'm a dem or a Clinton-backer. WRONG. Clinton bombed Serbia and attacked Somalia using ill-planned strategies. I never supported Clinton or his policies, and obviously don't support the current administration. I'm sorry, but assuming that China would not get involved if the U.S. attacked North Korea is pure ignorance. Plus, don't be fooled by U.S. fake 'diplomacy'. Diplomacy in Iraq? Surely you jest.

Answer 1

we tried a free nation but it failed special intrests won out since 1781 and have been winning ever since.
we tried but have ignored the constitution .
The federal government blackmails states to follow there leed or be cut of from federal money .BLACKMAIL plain and simple we live by the strong ruke the weak i have photoes of many rich men who slept with my partner in crime and make a good life this way .the strong do win in the end get use to it.
With nothing to gain and alot to lose we will bargin with korea just that simple .WHEN you were a kid the bulluies never bothered the kid walking home with his big brother it was the one brave enough to walk home alone that got picked on .SO Iraq told the world off when kuwait started slant drilling and had deals with the united states to import below market price billions of barrels of oil from kuwait.
GO figure us fighting or friend of 30 years saddam he was doomed like noriega was when we tried to make him attack his neighours and he told us to go fly a kite.
We always get our way and nothing can be done about it.

Answer 2

What are you smoking? We have been using diplomacy in North Korea for the last 53 years, since we declared a cease fire. Long before Walmart was around. So you think we are using diplomacy because we don't want to piss off the Chinese who are supplying us with all the cheap crap you get in Walmart? That's priceless. If you had been paying attention you would see that diplomacy has been used in all situations. Diplomacy did not stop Iraq invading Kuwait? Diplomacy did not work as Iraq ignored all UN resolutions for 13 years. Sure Clinton was great, he lets us get attacked all over the Damn world, didn't need diplomacy because he wasn't going to do a damn thing to stop them anyway. Log off, go pick up a book and learn your facts before you come on here spouting your communist drivel about corporate America.

Answer 3

Perhaps this is true, there is evidence of it. But even if it wasn't, America is not currently capable of fighting North Korea (and China does not support North Korea because China believes North Korea may attack China) because nearly all of our army, marines, and national guard are tied up in Iraq or the hurricanes headed for America and of course the border.

Answer 4

You need to do your research before making a fool out of yourself. If you remember Bush waited to see if diplomacy would work in Iraq as well. He allowed the UN to botch inspection after inspection before finally taking matters into his own hands (wrongly so IMO but the UN wasn't handling things any better either). China is as concerned about NK as the US is. NK and China do not have particularly friendly relationships right now. NK owes them a lot of money and China holds no hope of seeing it again.

And yes being able to launch a missile eight miles in the air before it loses control poses a HUGE threat. Hoo boy, I'm scared of that one. I live in OK, USA and I actually fear for my life what with missiles targeted for here exploding across the Pacific Ocean.

Answer 5

holy freaking shitt. Do you even bother to read the history on these two isues? like further back than just this term, or last?

Youre not even basing this question on anything factual, just your half baked opinion. Atleast, please, take a few days to research and study the issues before making a statement.

Then you can not only sound educated, but make some sense.

Answer 6

your question is a speach of bs
yes he would rather not kill a few million because of 1 idiot
but what you want him to attack so that you can talk more trash

Answer 7

Let me guess you are a pacifist puke?

Answer 8

NO!!!