I known this person for a year and we got real close that we started having sex,the last time i seen him was dec 2005,and had another mate and i got pregnant in jan of 2006 and had my baby in nov.is it a possibility it can be my other friend i seen since dec,or the other one.Please help
2006-07-06 06:07:26 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Family & Relationships ➔ Other - Family & Relationships
whowas sthe lasr person u had sex with in Feburary?...... Cuz U can only be pregnant for 9 months and also only 2 weeks after 9 months...... But u were pregnant for 10 months if u x-plain ti like that......... also if u have doubts tell u'r fridn 1st then go get a blood test just to be sure it could be u'r little secret if he is not the father , then u could move on...........
2006-07-06 06:12:15 · answer #1 · answered by •°♥Ms. SeXy♥°• 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well, let's do the math, takes about 9 months. If the last time you saw "Guy 1" was in Dec. 2005, and you had your baby in Nov. 2006, that's 11 months. A little too long for a pregnancy. Even with "Guy 2" in Jan. 2006, that's still 10 months in between. "Guy 2" would be the most likely one. Unless of course there's a "Guy 3" in there somewhere.
2006-07-06 13:16:58 · answer #2 · answered by JustAdude 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well sweety it all depends on the conception date. If your due in Nov. then you conceived sometime at the end of Jan beginning of Feb. So I don't think its the guy from Dec. Unless your not really due in Nov. The due date is based on when you told the MD your last menstrual cycle was. So if your wrong or really don't know then maybe. You wont know till you have the baby. If you end up having the baby before Nov, I would say it could be the Dec guy. Its pretty close call. Figure out when the last time you slept with the Dec guy and the first time you slept with the other guy, let me know and I will try to help you figure it out.
2006-07-06 13:16:18 · answer #3 · answered by grrrrme 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
DNA testing is 98% accurate.. if you don't want to calculate and do math on how long you were pregnant to check. Otherwise...
A normal pregnancy lasts from 38-42weeks before a doctor can induce pregnancy. If you calculate the last time you had sex with your partner in dec and the date of the baby's birth falls within 42weeks of that date, then go ahead and have the pregnancy test... otherwise your new bf is definitely the father.
2006-07-06 13:22:27 · answer #4 · answered by Jest21 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
OK if you had sex with them one month apart yes it is. They are only guessing when they say how many months you are. The only way to know exactly how many months you are is to know exactly when you got pregnant. For instance if your husband is away and came home on June 20 and that was the only day that you two had sex since he was gone for the past 4 months. You know situations like that. But if you are sexually active on a regular basis its not that easy to tell. It is possible, think about it everyone says that you are pregnant for 9 months, when you go to the doctor he says that you your pregnancy last 40 weeks typically. 40 weeks is 10 months. I think that if you really wanna know and you do not trust what people are saying about it ask the doctor if that is possible. I do not believe that it was too far apart for it to be possible.
2006-07-06 13:16:09 · answer #5 · answered by Nicole C 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well you gotta think long and hard. was your last period before or after you had sex with him. If it was after you are safe but if not then you have two options
tell him and get a perturnity test.
Or
say nothing and go on living (only you know the secret)
2006-07-06 13:11:53 · answer #6 · answered by dido45dido 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would have a blood test done just in case. You never know, you could have been pregnant for a month and not even know it! So yeah, a blood test will tell you. JERRY! JERRY! JERRY!
2006-07-06 13:12:13 · answer #7 · answered by Thomas 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First of all...use protection
Second of all...tell the dad's
Third of all...I feel sorry for your little one. Got a right to know who the dad is.
2006-07-06 13:10:40 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
The timeline is so close that I would imagine he could be the father.
2006-07-06 13:10:44 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it sure sounds like a distinct possibility. better take a blood test.
2006-07-06 13:10:04 · answer #10 · answered by Man_With_No_Name 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋