Would you want the "inocent" arabs housed in gitmo to move in next door to you...they are hardly inocent.
Why not pull your head out and use REAL reasons to bash Bush, it is not like you don't have any poor policy to debate. You and your ignorance are the reasons I could never call myself liberal.
2006-07-06 04:10:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by mymadsky 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hell no. I would rather have Bush who at least sticks by his lies! Hillary is so wishy- washy and never sticks to her comments. Now about your stupid Hitler comparison. Bush did not attack Arabs first okay. Have you forgotten about 9-11? Get your head out of your as s. And who else is going to rebuild Iraq? The Iraqies? There is PLENTY of work here in America. New Orleans is still in bad condition. Why does he need to start a war across the world, get real. How does the "patriot act" strip freedom? I really dont care if the government is looking trough some phone calls to find terrorist. It might keep me alive, Stupid. If they were not monitoring bank account, which is the most obvious thing to do, and we got attacked again people like you would blame that on George as well. AND those guys in Cuba would kill you without even thinking twice. They are anything but innocent. I mean do you honestly believe the $hit that is coming out of your mouth? you are stupid. Now dont get me wrong I dont like having a C average Commander and Chief, but Fuc k Hillary.
2006-07-06 04:42:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hiliary Clinton is a pig. She stayed with slick willy to get to the top. No different then a women sleeping to the top. I am an educated, pretty successful woman and WOULD NEVER vote for that pig. Does anyone realize that she was republican and the became democrat when she thought she could get her hubby into national politics???
Most women that I know feel the same way. I am not rich and am a now republican. Like good ole Ronald Regan said, "I did not leave the democratic party, it left me"!!!!
Hilary doesn't know what family values mean so how can she lead this country? what a pig...
MESSAGE FROM DEM. HATER:
From: Republican Hater
Subject: It seems like your the whore
Message: With a name like busy mommy it must mean
B =***** I am very vocal in my beliefs.
U=Unintelligent I have advanced degrees from well known universities and actually have taught at the college level.
S=****
Y=Your ***** stank - you are so full of it. DEMS ALWAYS HAVE TO MAKE COMMENTS WITHOUT BACKING THEM UP WITH FACTS....
You should not call hillary a pig and a whore, and ronald regan was a bastard. You are a white trailer park trash whore who needs more than a lessson in manners you need a real man in your life *****>
I take it you don't like strong willed women? I am very succesful and could give you my background but I have a life. I suggest you get one to :-) Instead of chatting on these forums, GET A LIFE!
2006-07-06 04:30:43
·
answer #3
·
answered by angelsmommy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm not sure who would be a good Prez the next time around, but thank goodness Bush can't be re-elected. Let's just hope his freaking brother doesn't run because they're going to run the country in the ground. Wait, we DID elect someone other than Bush... we elected Gore and Bush and his brother, the gov. or FL decided to CHEAT and got away with it. There's no hope. We might as well allow them to become dictators because there's been no retribution for what they did.
It's interesting the parallels you made. Actually, it's a little scary. I think Hitler was a bit smarter, however, syphalis had driven him mad. Bush is dumber without the syphalis, so I guess that makes them even.
2006-07-06 04:13:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by dark_storm73 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Drawing parallels between Bush and Hitler is exactly what I would expect from a supporter of a cynical, snyde, foul-mouthed and disrespectful shrew like Hillary Clinton.
Also, you should realize that bashing large corporations like Halliburton is a liberal tactic, used by poverty-pimps to incite jealousy and anger in class-sensitive debates.
Just so you understand this, there was NO no-bid contract. I've seen the documents myself, and the contract in question was definitely bid out. Unless you've seen the documents yourself, you're just regurgitating misinformation that was put out by...ummm...whom, exactly? Think about that before you post again, please.
2006-07-06 04:10:27
·
answer #5
·
answered by Think First 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary does not have a chance to be elected as president, unless she is running against Rice, and never will. The US won't be ready for a female leader for another 50 - 100 years. The best she could hope for is to get the VP slot and then follow a president who died in office.
2006-07-06 05:13:03
·
answer #6
·
answered by ceprn 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think you've made some good analogies and I applaud your critical thinking skills. You need to spell check though or others will think you're illiterate or crazy. I don't know that Hillary has that much of a chance because she is a woman and too many hold that against her. I do believe that we need to throw a bunch of crooks out of Congress though. Democrats need to start fighting back when Republicans sling mud and they need to take some kind of stand on issues. I for one, will be voting against those that have turned a deaf ear to the "People" of America.
2006-07-06 04:16:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by teri 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No! Hilary Clinton would be the worst thing to do. She would probably turn this country in to a communist country. President Bush is a good president and its not easy making choices like he has to. Bush doesnt slaughter arabs either. Its the terriosts who are doing the suicide bombers u idiot. U r a no brain liberal hypocret.
2006-07-06 04:09:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are a moron.
Bush freed arabs.
Bush put terrorists in jail (would you like to bring them into your home?).
Halliburton was around long before Bush/Cheney. Halliburton got all the nobid contracts during Clinton's administration as well. Its not a party thing, they have no competition.
Like I said, you are a moron.
2006-07-06 04:09:59
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
But Hillary supports the war on terror...she is not your candidate. You want someone like John Kerry or Russ Feingold on your ticket. By the way, your grasp of history is as firm as your understanding of politics, grammar and spelling.
2006-07-06 04:10:56
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋