Should Bush be impeached for lying about WMD, for revealing agent Valerie Plane's id or spying on US citizens?

Answer 1

No. And you're pretty stupid to say that he lied about WMD's. He got bad intelligence, and believed it. It happens. How about this- grow up a little bit yourself, and get over the fact that Kerry lost. Your next chance to put a Democrat in office isnt that far away. But all this crying and whining that started when you lost both times is pretty pathetic. And Im no Bush lover myself- but I really cant stand whiners.

Answer 2

First of all, Bush did NOT lie about WMD. How many times do the weapons have to be found before you people will believe that? Even if you don't trust that the weapons were found, the notion that one man can lie an entire country into war just to satisfy some personal agenda, while the rest of the world either joins behind him or does nothing, is pretty unrealistic. It's fun to bash the president, but actual thinking might take a bit more effort.

Second, it's Valerie Plame, not Plane.

Third, what evidence do you have that Bush leaked her name himself? Are you really that far gone? Does any of this really make even the slightest sense to you?

And finally, it's not "spying", it's collecting certain types of data and it was done years ago, just as it is today. There's nothing wrong with the government being vigilant.

So no, there's no real reason for the president to be impeached.

Answer 3

Please... he did no longer "lie" approximately WMD's. They have been there. actual everyone believed they have been on the beginning up. Even Kerry. Saddam had some extreme organic and organic weapons which they have got here across information of. additionally, i'm uncertain how Bush unmarried handedly destroyed our ecosystem. it sort of looks like actual everyone has a hand in that. And your imprecise accusation of bush spying on individuals is slightly generalized. So, no, i do no longer think of he would be impeached. Sorry.

Answer 4

Absolutely, Bush put soldiers in danger in Iraq for personal reasons. Bush has made so many bad decisions, he should step down. Clinton was impeached on a lot less. The next president to take over will spend their first four years trying to cleanup his mess.

Answer 5

Smitty...come out of your bunker and into the real world.

Yes, W ought to be impeached for the reasons you stated and for others as well. He has actually broken our laws, and last time I looked, boinking a White House intern wasn't illegal (OK, unethical, I give you, but not illegal). Taking our country to war on false pretenses, revealing the identity of a CIA agent and spying on US citizens without probable cause are ALL illegal actions! I saw a great tee shirt recently that said, "Would somebody please give W a BJ so we can impeach him already?"

Answer 6

no. some heads should have rolled in the intelligence area for the "false" information, but thats not an impeachable offense. If it was, then why didn't we impeach Lyndon Johnson for Vietnam, and the president during WWII with the Normandy invasion for walking into a horrible situation there looking for massive artillery that wasn't there.

Answer 7

Bush acted in good faith on information given to him at the time. Don't think it was for oil; look at the price of gas now!

As far as spying on citizens, they've had that over in England for years with cameras up on telephone poles just watching everyone. You don't think the CIA monitors the internet and your email, opens a certain amount of regular mail just to check it out and listens in on your phone once in a while?

Answer 8

No is the simple answer
1. What do we do about that Lying Clinton, he also said that Iraq had WDM?
2. What do we do about the CIA and FBI they both said Iraq had WMD?
3. What do we do about the defence department they said Iraq had WMD?

I think theres enough blame to go around on this still unresolved matter!

Answer 9

You can thank 8 years of the Clinton administration for the deplorable condition of our intelligence services. While we may have been wrong about WMD, Bush didn't "lie" about anything.

Answer 10

Yes, Yes & Yes

No mater where you try to shift the blame, it is ultamately Bush's responsiblity and he should be held accoutable. Because as he himself said "I'm the decider"