English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

25 answers

The Jews of that era didn't arange their own marriages, they were promised from childhood. They didn't just fall in love and marry as is done now.
Christ didn't meet Mary until almost time for his death. He wouldn't have married at 32 years old when he knew he was to be crucified at 33.
We are told that he didn't have a roof over his head. A man was not able to marry until he had a hime.
He had no regular income. A Jew couldn't marry until he had an income to support a fimily.
It was the biggest sin of the times to have a child out of wedlock. The crime demanded stoning.

2006-07-05 20:58:43 · answer #1 · answered by Chetco 7 · 0 0

this question has been asked several times. no Jesus never married or had children with Mary Magdalene. Jesus came to the earth to tell everyone about his Father Jehovah and to let his Fathers name be known. Mary Magdalene was not his mother, it was a different Mary. that movie was full of lies, I don't know why anyone would waste there money on that trash of lies about Jesus Christ. or read the trash of a book

2006-07-06 03:14:45 · answer #2 · answered by lover of Jehovah and Jesus 7 · 0 0

It is very possible Jesus (pbuh) -- I do that to confuse people reading the answers (pbut) - was of marriagable age. Rabbis got married. No one much would have trusted an unmarried man.

Now the bit about who His kids were - the French - is interesting. They certainly *act* as though it were true, don't they?

There is a Book of Mary Magdelene that has been editted out of the Bible. Well worth reading.

Again, so what would it have hurt? Jesus was born, He ate, He slept, He messed His diapers, put His sandals on one at a time. My suspicions are that anyone making Him out to be G_D would have gotten a knuckle sandwich from Jesus. Jesus was a Jew. Jews believe in only one G_d and His name is spelled Yod Hey Vav Hey (with some vowels sprinkled in).

2006-07-05 21:01:26 · answer #3 · answered by NeoArt 6 · 0 0

I belive that Jesus would want to pass on his genes to another generation. If he was ever married to Mary Magdalene, which is debatable.

And Mary Magdalene was not his mother, in reference to the retard out there who said so.

2006-07-05 20:59:26 · answer #4 · answered by norsedoggie 3 · 0 0

The whole idea of Jesus marrying Mary Magdelene was created by gnostics approximately 170 years after the death of Christ. No one prior to that wrote or mentioned any such thing. The Gnostics wanted to show that Jesus was a human who achieved Godhood by his own actions, in the hope that they could acheive Godhood by their own actions.

Man is man, God is God, and there is only one mediator between God and man, the Man Jesus.

2006-07-05 20:48:34 · answer #5 · answered by wildmlwilson 2 · 0 0

What difference does it really make now anyway? Is someone in a hurry to try & claim their hereditary rights? Truthfully, "Religion", such as it has unfortunately come to be, kinda makes me sick. No one yet can tell me where "God" came from and now everybody is all in a big tiff over the possibility of Jesus having had extrmarital sex? There are much more important and "real" issues in this world to be trying to solve/resolve.

2006-07-05 20:51:08 · answer #6 · answered by Smokie 1 · 0 0

Why does it matter? I am hoping he was a man and got laid at least once. Christ has been martyred for 2000 years. It's about time someone brought him down from the pedestal.

2006-07-05 20:49:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no it isnt. unless you want to believe in the davinci stuff which admittedly is 95% fiction. Davinci didnt even believe in jesus, he liked to atagonize the church and painted the last supper purposely with a womans face next to Christ to mess with the catholic doctrine. If it were possible i think he'd be laughin in his grave at how he got over on millions.

2006-07-05 20:46:10 · answer #8 · answered by glowchild7 3 · 0 0

nobody knows for sure, but the consensus is No, since none have ever been mentioned, nor any marriage between the two. If he was in fact married, there should have been some mention of it in all the documents they have in the vatican.

2006-07-05 20:47:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I am along for accepting all possibitlites, me being a deconverted christian. But do not look here for acceptance of ideas, only the regurgitation of that which you have already been informed.

2006-07-05 20:45:40 · answer #10 · answered by Bergerking 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers