English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

There is a Chapter in the Holy Qur'ân, named Surat u Maryam "Chapter Mary", named in honor of Mary the mother of
Jesus Christ, peace and blessings of Allah be upon him; again, such an honor is not to be found given to Mary in the
Christian Bible. Out of the 66 books of the Protestants and 73 of the Roman Catholics, not one is named after Mary or
her son. You will find books named after Matthew, Mark, Luke, John, Peter, Paul and two score more obscure names,
but not a single one is that of Mary!
If Prophet Muhammed, salla Allah u alihi wa sallam, was the author of the Holy Qur'ân, then he would not have failed to include
in it with Mary, the mother of Jesus, his own mother Aamina, his dear wife Khadija, or his beloved daughter Fatimah.
But No! No! This can never be. The Qur'ân is not his handiwork!.

Please read the TRUE WORD OF GOD called Al Qur'an.
Remember
There is no god but Allah, Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) is the last messenger of Allah

2006-07-05 20:07:37 · 10 answers · asked by Dai 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

10 answers

good job... keep it up... may ALLAH reward u with his choicest blessings for ur efforts!

2006-07-05 20:13:14 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Your question is totally irrelevant to the message and teachings of the Bible. The Gospels, Matthew, Mark, Luke and John are named after their respective human writers. The Apostle Paul wrote the Lion's share (yes, bad pun intended) of the New Testament, and not one of them is named after him. This does not make their contents any less or more important.

The Gospels mention Mary because she was the vessel that God chose to give birth to Jesus. Nothing more. Not even a book author. When Jesus was conceived, Mary was a virgin. Afterward, it is very clear from Biblical accounts that Mary and Joseph had other human children. (Jude is Jesus' biological half brother.) She did not die a virgin. She is not and should not be deified. The only human that deserves deification is Jesus Christ, because he is fully God, fully human and wholly infallible all at the same time.

Jesus does not need a specific book of the Bible named after Him because the entire Word is about Him. Each book of the Old Testament either prophesies His coming, has a protagonist that symbolizes some feature of Him as a Kinsman Redeemer, or analyzes the impact of His coming.

Shalom.

2006-07-05 20:30:14 · answer #2 · answered by SedaCanela 3 · 0 0

What is more important is " Jesus" the appointed one. The one who offered himself as a sacrifice for the sake of all, and god raised him up. The core message is Jesus. The central figure is Jesus and not Mary. Whats this fuss about the Books. What should be of greater concern is salvation & the knowledge of truth. There are many who want to prove God Wrong, is he powerless ? no. He's patient because he has justified you through Christ. He see's the blood that his son shed to justify you.
He is giving us time. Be free when time is at hand for " when the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed"
Be after Gods heart...I became a Christian because of a Muslim Lady. Her name is Bilques Sheikh. A lady from Pakistan. She wrote a book called " I dared to call him Father" a real eye opener.
Read it.. you will know the father.Read Luke ch 15.
May God fill you with Peace & true knowledge. May he reveal himself to you.He loves you passionately, listen to his voice.

2006-07-05 20:38:39 · answer #3 · answered by Shaan 3 · 0 0

There are those who insist that the Qur'an was copied, that it originated in Christian and Jewish sources. As a matter of fact, a book published in recent years called Worshipping the Wrong God has stated, as though it were a fact, that after the first revelation of the Qur'an came to Muhammad, peace be upon him, that his wife died and so he quickly married a Jew and a Christian, and this is where he drew the rest of his sources for his book.

Well, they have the facts partly right. It was ten years after the first revelation of the Qur'an that his wife died, and it was another ten years after that when the Qur'an was virtually completed that he married a Jew and a Christian.

Did he copy from Jewish and Christian sources? In the Qur'an, the ruler of Egypt who opposed Moses is known as Fir'aun, not Pharaoh. The Jews and Christians have always said 'Pharaoh'. It is easy for an Arab to say 'Pharaoh'. But in the Qur'an, it is Fir'aun, with an 'n'. Why? Surely the Jews must have teased them about that and said: "You've got the word wrong. It's 'Pharaoh' and not Fir'aun." But they insisted on it and it continues that way in the Qur'an, Fir'aun.

As it happens, this historical writings of Herodotus, the Greek historian, exist to this day, and Herodotus comments on the ruler of Egypt, being in his day and in the centuries before him, one man who went by the title of Fir'aun.

Did the book copy from the Christians sources? The Qur'an insists that Jesus was not crucified, that this was only an illusion, but that the Jews who thought they crucified Jesus were mistaken because it was not really so. Christians would have no part of that. As it happens, the idea that Jesus was not really crucified is really very ancient and can be traced back to the first century. But Christians who believed that were eliminated as heretics within the first two-hundred years after the time of Jesus and they were not teaching this doctrine anywhere around the Arabian Peninsula fourteen centuries ago.

Could the author of the Qur'an have been copying from Christian sources when he says that Jesus spoke to man as a babe (3:46) and in later life? The Arabic word used indicates that he was still speaking to man and teaching to them in the forties. The Christians have always maintained that Jesus was gone by the time he was thirty-three. It indicates that there could have been no copying. In fact, a man would have to be stubborn and insists on the points as explained in the Qur'an in the face of Christian opposition who would have said: "No! No! I wasn't like that. We tell the story differently."

2006-07-05 20:14:43 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

wow, the Moslems are out tonight aren't they?

so, the Quran talks about Mary and it talks about Jesus. you have whole chapters and whole phrases for them, we get it.
but why? if Jesus was just another prophet, why does He get all this extra attention?

lol ubscure names. yeah that revelation, he was a real good writer!

look man, if you wish you convert us to Islam, it's not a good idea to show us the Quran fawning all over Jesus Christ....

2006-07-05 20:16:23 · answer #5 · answered by cirque de lune 6 · 0 0

You fell in the same historical mistake that all Muslims have confuusion between Mariam (Moses and Aaron's sister) and Mary (Jesus mother)

2006-07-08 16:38:58 · answer #6 · answered by Bionimetiket 2 · 0 0

I thought it was named after Mary Johnson, Latisha’s sister from over there around the 24th street projects.

2006-07-05 20:23:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

So, what is the big deal about this???????????????

Jesus or Mary did not need to have books written after their names.

2006-07-05 20:12:00 · answer #8 · answered by dt_aiying 2 · 0 0

Alright Im going to eat you now...

2006-07-05 20:10:34 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

http://obeyfortune.ytmnd.com/

2006-07-05 20:11:38 · answer #10 · answered by BlackAdder_MB 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers