I thought it said a government by the people, of the people, and for the people, but the government wants us to believe we work for them. Has anyone read the constitution, where it says that if the president becomes singlemindedness of purpose, to the exclusion of anything else, that it is not only our right, but our duty to replace him with one who has the interests of the people at heart? Please read the constitution, and see for yourself, I might have misunderstood.
2006-07-05 18:33:54 · 9 answers · asked by Darqblade 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Civic Participation
In education and understanding you will find truth. The truth is we now live in a dictatorship. The last two elections were fixed. That is the truth. In 2004 Bu$h was not elected he was appointed by a Bias High court that ruled against States rights.
The bias High Court just ruled in favor of Tom Delay in Texas which put a end to impeachment.
The President has many times exceeded his authority over the people and in fact does not support the Constitution he swore to support. The Constitution clearly states "equal but separate powers and Congress as also failed to support the Constitution they swore to protect and defend.
2006-07-06 04:25:38 · answer #1 · answered by jl_jack09 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No...you didn't misunderstand the Constitution: you exactly interpeted it's meaning there. According to the Constitution, when it's evident the President shuts out the will of the people; the majority vote of the House and Senate, then the people DO have the right to recall him out of office.
And we once did it--and almost had it done a second time, too!
Back in the early '70's: a tax scandal rocked the White House and had Nixon vice prez Spiro Agnew step down and resign in disgrace, replaced by House Speaker Gerald Ford as new Nixon VP. Then, the Watergate scandal broke loose and caused Nixon himself to be impeached; fired from his Presidency, replaced by Ford.
Interesting note: Gerald Ford was the "quarterback" staffer on The Warren Committee, who "solved" the JFK assassination.
President Bill Clinton was ALMOST impeached due to nasty sex scandal innuendo (among other nasty ALLEGED illegal misdoings), but he slipped out naturally out of office, allowing for a regular Presidental election.
But enough of the history lesson: Can we really recall an President who doesn't serve OUR interests? Why, sure we can! But why stop at the President : you can impeach / recall ANY elected official.....provided you satisfy the criteria. And it's akin to climbing Mt. Everest w/out any safety gear and about as equally successful.
Impeachment of a President will require a HUGE number of people, a EVEN MORE HUGE amount of $$$$$, a top-notch legal and PR media staff.....and the driven will to accomplish what the people together want: to fire the President.
But in the end, currently: we have a Government that DOES think we work for them and they affirm their belief they control us because in their eyes, we--the People--are mindless cattle.
2006-07-05 18:53:33 · answer #2 · answered by Mr. Wizard 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Given the experimental nature of the completed pharmaceutical marketplace, its fairly complicated to celebrate with both elements effect that would want to effect a million or 2 people in each and every million. Thats why the goverment has regulations. If the drug can meet them, then the drug will be advertised. this does not advise that the drug is one hundred% protect. you understand this when you think about that you listen consistent warnings on each and every drug commercial you be conscious. it really is not anyones 'fault' at the same time as topics bypass undesirable, its part of techniques that marketplace works. diverse situations the drug's reward are nicely worth detrimental elements. each and every sometimes edge consequences dont floor until eventually the drug is uncovered to a large number of persons. holding its the 'greedy authorities' isn't precisely observing the topic from all regulations.
2016-11-05 23:14:32 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The president is not that stupid. He knows what he's doing, even if you think he does some stuff not quite correct. And in the end you work for the government. Because you can't put just any Tom, Dick and Harry there and think it'll be better afterwards, because they don't think exactly as the president.
2006-07-05 18:43:43 · answer #4 · answered by John P 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
chicagoan86
if the US is full of people like you then you are right.. normal people, wishing to understand a simple thing like this question should have a right to be answered.
To be rude just tipifies why he has asked this question. You are a very unintelligent person asked a rhetorical question.... But you are as subtle as the cruise missiles you would like to fire on any other country chosing not to agree with your ignorant delusions.
2006-07-05 18:55:28 · answer #5 · answered by simsjk 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are such an idiot I want to deport you right now! You don't deserve to live in this country you piece of crap! Whatever happened to ask not what your country can do for you, but what you can do for you country.
2006-07-05 18:36:31 · answer #6 · answered by chicagoan86 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
we work to make the rich get richer and there is no we. its them and the greedy who run it for their own benefit.
2006-07-05 18:37:59 · answer #7 · answered by hollywood71@verizon.net 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
i agree with simjk
2006-07-05 19:04:51 · answer #8 · answered by mz.Tiza 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you pay taxes, you vote and you die
2006-07-05 18:38:22 · answer #9 · answered by william R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋