If the Global flood never happened. Why didn't anyone reject this ancient story?

Question

300 cultures have a global flood or local flood story. There are no known documents that reject this story.

Answer 1

It did happen.

Answer 2

It did NOT happen, people! There is not, nor has there ever been, nor will there ever be, enough water to cover all the mountains of the world. It is not merely improbable, it is IMPOSSIBLE. For the love of pants, LEARN SOME SCIENCE. No reputable scientist in the world believes that any of the hundreds of flood myths are true--that is why they are called MYTHS and not FACTS. At most, there might have been localized flooding events around the time of the last Ice Age, but nothing at all like a worldwide flood covering the entire surface of the planet. It is not possible, no matter how much Chrisians might wish it to be so. People make up stories all the time, and people then form into large groups that break up and spread out. They take their stories with them, the stories change, different groups mingle and split up again and again. Is it any wonder there are so many different versions? Go to the link below and tell me which one I am to believe, because they all look as absurd as a fairy tale.

Answer 3

Back in those days people thought the world was flat and worshiped rocks and sticks. Local flood maybe. Global flood impossible.

Answer 4

Myth is myth is myth ... until some 1500 years ago, people did not demand adherence to myths. This ideal come with the rise of Monotheism, and more with the rise of the latter term monotheism. Prior to about 1500 years ago, it was considered a story, and was not worth disagreeing with. Lets face it, for most people flood or no food, it does not matter in everyday life.

Answer 5

Plate tectonics actual does teach that the global flood not in any respect befell, and it has not something to do with sea shells on mountain tops. If we take the most customary creationist date of 4004 BC and upload up the begats from Adam to Noah, we hit upon the "flood" befell about 4,four hundred years in the past. I ignore the precise style. surely it does not actual count if the introduction date become 10,000 years BC because an same argument applies. Supposing as you assert the mountains were lots flatter, then the Himalaya (that are being pushed up by using India's bypass northward into Eurasia) they might have had to enhance a lot extra straight away than they do on the on the spot. this may propose the Indian plate will be transferring north at a a lot more advantageous price than is achievable, thousands of situations speedier. effects will be many extra very serious earthquakes in western China. they have serious ones there, yet not dozens each and every 5 years. yet another outcome will be speedy differences interior the classes of rivers over historic time and the last of commerce routes interior of an same era. people would observe. yet the "silk street", widespread in pre-Roman situations remains open (except the position politically closed) and the passes from Tibet by skill of to India and China proceed to be usable as they have been for thousands of years. international locations like Nepal and Kashmir will be uninhabitable by skill of close to-continuous earthquakes. make higher this to the linked Australian plate and we've an same style of element. Australia strikes about NNE at slightly over 2.5 inches in line with year. For one in all those mountain construction seen in New Guinea to take in simple terms 4000 to 9000 years the full Australian continent would have had to be transferring at something like one thousand situations that variety of price, in different words, it will be someplace close to 9 miles NNE of the position it become even as practice dinner sailed up the coast in 1770 truly of in simple terms about 40 8 ft, tops. Australia will be transferring north so quickly that there will be a bow wave in the front of it interior the Arafura Sea and the Torres Strait and a wake in the back of it interior the Southern Ocean. The friction in touch would soften the crust of the Earth. The volcanoes, earthquakes and tsunamis interior the Indonesian islands would cause them to uninhabitable, truly of in simple terms being occassionally disastrous. All of this may be obtrusive on GPS, too. All this has already been worked out, earlier.

Answer 6

Some are saying that it is folklore because so many cultures share the story, with few changes. Confusing, isn't it?!?!? If we use similar logic for 100 people who saw a thunderstorm, we would say that the storm was just a legend. Just because it's hard to imagine doesn't make it impossible!!! That's the great thing about God - He can do the impossible!!

Answer 7

Most of the flood stories pre-date the biblical account which means the Bible story was copied from other cultures

Answer 8

The great flood never happened.
People believe it because their religion insists that they believe it.
This is my known document rejecting the story.
You pulled the 300 out of your @ss.

Answer 9

Excellent question. The answer is that the flood DID happen...it's in God's Word and is absolutely true!

Answer 10

Which 300 or so, could you please elaborate and provide reference material to these cultural flood stories?

Answer 11

It happened in modern day iraq i think. they did a special on it on the national geographic channel