English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

We are currently using Time Warner cable and paying too much ($120/month). I have 2 High definition capable TVs and want DVR capability on at least one tv.

2006-07-05 12:12:25 · 3 answers · asked by Untouchable 1 in Consumer Electronics TVs

3 answers

I prefer satellite because of the clear picture. But, one should research the channel cable or satellite TV offers to find the one that suits your needs. DVR are a must I simply love mines. I currently have Dish Networks America's Top 180 because I get some movie channels without paying extra but that's just my preference.

2006-07-06 02:29:57 · answer #1 · answered by Markee Mark 2 · 0 0

Satellite has a better picture and is more affordable (at least around here). We went from Adelphia cable to DirecTV satellite.. Dish Network is the competition. We pay $45 a month.

2006-07-05 12:19:29 · answer #2 · answered by Stratobratster 6 · 0 0

i could use freeview, besides the fact that it is not available in my section yet. i do no longer go with to enroll in Sky, so i don't have that the two. What I do have is a Silvercrest SL65 satellite tv for pc container. It we could me see each and all of the channels available on Sky that are no longer encrypted. The SL65 cost me £40 whilst in comparison with a Sky container which might cost £a hundred and fifty on their "Freesat" container. it fairly is better than three times the cost just to function a card slot. in my opinion Sky has too super a monopoly on satellite tv for pc television. I nonetheless do no longer comprehend why some channels that are available on Freeview for no longer something, are purely available on subscription centers from Sky. looks unfair to me. do no longer even get me began on my opinion of Channel 4 and 5 persevering with to broadcast encrypted centers on Sky, whilst the BBC and ITV have been "unfastened to air" for a while now. My section is going digital next 12 months, yet i'm thinking how even the provider would be. i'm getting my sign from a sub-transmitter and that i've got heard that they won't have each and all of the channels which would be available from substantial masts. It won't marvel me. prevalent.

2016-12-14 04:39:11 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers