2006-07-05 09:52:41 · 10 answers · asked by Beaujock 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
As much as I'd love to, we can't. We have to follow the Liberal Minority rules of engagement, and wait until they lob a nuke at Los Angelos, and vaporize a few hundred thousand or so American citizens. Come to think of it, maybe that wouldn't be so bad. We'd probably lose two thirds of those cowardly liberals.
2006-07-05 10:00:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To begin with north korea is a threat. If they are aiming their missles in our direction its evident a conflict with them will be unavoidable. Invading north korea may cause them to launch more missles, and if were lucky they wont reach us. But if they do then california could be in danger. I would say let them make the first move. When we are sure of what their motives are then we should invade. For now we are involved in enough conflicts, invading north korea is a bad idea. Our military is already fully stretched and to invade north korea would involve the draft if not enough military personal are involved.
2006-07-12 15:17:13 · answer #2 · answered by give_god_a_chance2004 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We Are Financial unstable So We Shouldn't Be Invading Nobody Until The Country That We Are Currently In Pays Some Money To Us Then We Can But Not Until
2006-07-05 17:09:21 · answer #3 · answered by Phi nu 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I doubt there's anything to worry about, this isn't the first time North Korea has tried to pull something like this and I don't think it's the last. Kim Jong Il is crazy not stupid, he's just testing the waters to see what position such an action might put him in. The reason I doubt there's anything to worry about is that war also affects the surrounding countries and when you have a giant like china as a neighbor, it's best to turn down the music if he asks you too.
2006-07-05 21:30:16 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hell no! Isn't being in one war enough for anyone? Wasn't it someone here who is in office that helped N. Korea get their nukes anyway?
What is so wrong with trying for world peace anyway?
Again I ask, why does anyone at all want to invade, start wars or terrorize another country for anyway?
Isn't there just one country who is willing to make for first step toward world peace anyway?
Sounds almost like Bush is running N. Korea with them making threats to start another war but this time it's aimed at our whole country.
Stop and think for a change is what the people of every country should be telling those in office before getting another war started.
I guess I'm more scared then I ever thought I'd be now that so many different countries having their own nukes and with Bush in office now, no wonder we are being threatened by so many countries. Thanks a whole hell of a lot Bush!
2006-07-05 17:09:51 · answer #5 · answered by fedupmoma 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
people in the u.s. are overeacting don't forget, the missiles failed and north korea won't have the ability to launch a nuke at us for decades if ever, so all u warmongers shut the **** up we're already in deep **** in iraq because of people like you
2006-07-05 18:11:16 · answer #6 · answered by mel18 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well Japan will help us , China will help if we do go to war then the president should kill prime minester using an obselete container with a chemical weopon b4 we have to even send troops over.
That will appear to be a terrorist attack makin U.S.A heros
2006-07-05 17:29:38 · answer #7 · answered by Support Our Troops 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
not invade,show them first hand what a nuke can do.
2006-07-05 17:21:18 · answer #8 · answered by ssgtusmc3013 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
NO WAY THAT WOULD BE STUPID, THAT CRAZY WHACK JOB DON'T CARE IF HE KILLS BILLIONS OF BABIES, WE AT LEAST KNOW THEY AINT GOT MUCH COMPETENCE AS THERE MISSLE ONLY LASTED A FEW SECONDS, THEY AREN'T THAT BRIGHT.
2006-07-05 16:59:55 · answer #9 · answered by bryton1001 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Oh but they can't hit us or that's what the libs are saying.
2006-07-05 16:56:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋