1. Pork.
2. Shellfish.
3. Locust.
4. Rabbit.
2006-07-05 02:25:49 · 23 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
tofu.
oop sorry.
salad?
no, McDonalds.
2006-07-05 02:28:38 · answer #1 · answered by really? 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What time frame are you asking this question for? BC or AC? At present there is not food that the Bible condems us to eat if you really research it correctly. Back before Christ was born People were not supose to eat animals with a cleft hoof. (split if you perfer) Pig (pork has a split hoof, Rabbit has a split hoof) Locust is not an animal althought it was indeed eaten (See the book of John) And shellfish would also be permitted.
Today we are not restricted unto any animal for food however the one steadfast condemnation is the use of blood. We are still not to eat drink or use any blood in any fashion" The blood is sacrid"
2006-07-05 09:38:00 · answer #2 · answered by o_isee_u812 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The old testament says you're not supposed to eat pork, and the jews and muslims do not. However, it is nowhere in Christian doctrine that it's forbidden. I don't recall anything about shellfish, but it is a possibility. Who the hell would want to eat locust?
And actually, a lot of people ate rabbit.
2006-07-05 09:41:39 · answer #3 · answered by Rio 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In the days before refrigeration and irradiation, locusts could be caught on the fly, thereby making them safe to eat raw(eeech!) out in the desert where wood for fires was scarce. This is yet another example of the interpretation extremes of historical data and how it applies to modern life. I don't dis the Bible but I don't take it literally and I try to learn in what context do I look at a passage from. Life did not come with an instruction book. If man is capable of using 100% of his brain, then why do we settle for using only 10%?
2006-07-05 09:40:27 · answer #4 · answered by changRdie 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
3 Locust
2006-07-05 09:27:15 · answer #5 · answered by two of Pentacles 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The new testament changed the laws of food for the Gentiles.The laws concerning food were designed for a people who lived in a specific place.Pork,shellfish spoil easily Rabbits are prone to disease carried by pests that don't die without freezing temperatures. Locusts carry no disease and do not spoil.
2006-07-05 09:38:06 · answer #6 · answered by Tommy G. 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Locust are OK, owing to the position of their legs. Pork is right out, owing to the cloven hooves. Shellfish for some reason not fully explained.
I think rabbits got cuffed from the list as well.
Isn't this from Leviticus?
2006-07-05 09:32:19 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
3-4
2006-07-05 09:28:34 · answer #8 · answered by panda 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends upon who "you" are.
Christians and Messianic Jews are not held to the Mosaic dietary Laws; we are free to eat (or not eat) anything we choose.
With regard to Jews who do not believe Jesus is the Promised Messiah, things get a bit tricky. The bottom line for them is they must follow the laws, although this will not, by itself, save them from God's judgement. Although they do not (at this time) have a marriage relationship with God (Jeremiah 3), they hold to the Commandments within varying degrees as a way of proving their fidelity. This will change in the future, as per Jeremiah 31.
2006-07-05 09:33:41 · answer #9 · answered by Suzanne: YPA 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Locust in the Old Testament, however these dietary restrictions were removed in the New Testament.
2006-07-05 09:30:47 · answer #10 · answered by bobm709 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
John the Baptist was into Locusts so it must be 3.
2006-07-05 09:39:29 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋