that's the funniest thing Ive read yet...............rock on dude
2006-07-05 03:09:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by zombie>>1972 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
hermaphrodite (or synchronous hermaphrodite): The organism has both male and woman sexual organs together as an human being. frequently, self-fertilization does not take position. celebration: Hamlets, which (compared to different fish) seem fairly comfy mating in the front of divers, allowing observations in the wild to take position without project. they don't practice self-fertilization, yet even as they arrive across a mate, the pair takes turns between which one acts because the male and which acts because the female by using distinctive matings, frequently over the technique countless nights.
2016-11-01 05:50:44
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No - neither set is complete. In the hermaphrodites I've seen, usually there are just some parts of the other sex there. They are really sad cases and usually a test is done to see if their DNA is male or female and then the opposite parts are removed and the chosen sex parts added if possible.
2006-07-05 02:19:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Moolu 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
no that is just a midth... when the are born with both doctora ecstract the organ that has no movement and leve there dominant organ...
2006-07-05 02:20:14
·
answer #4
·
answered by kryssy 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. They don't have the uterus and the testes, just the reproductive organs.
2006-07-05 02:17:04
·
answer #5
·
answered by Rio 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Just a follow up question. Wouldn't that count as incest?
2006-07-05 02:17:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Odin M 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Off course not!
2006-07-05 02:18:37
·
answer #7
·
answered by Taimoor 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
wow so it is true ! thought it was only a south park joke ;)
2006-07-05 02:32:34
·
answer #8
·
answered by ricky 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
No
2006-07-05 02:16:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by Martin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
yes but that would be incest
2006-07-05 02:17:35
·
answer #10
·
answered by fozio 6
·
0⤊
0⤋